Scarlet Fever Llanelli Rugby Sport Wales Tickets Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > RUGBY > GENERAL RUGBY
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - England V Argentina
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login


England V Argentina
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
roy munster View Drop Down
Veteran
Veteran
Avatar

Joined: 30 August 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 15369 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote roy munster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 September 2023 at 5:01pm
Originally posted by scarletpimp scarletpimp wrote:

The major downside of ITV coverage , is having Dallaglio and Woodward in the studio, particularly , when England are playing.
Luckily, I can dive into the kitchen during the break, to make a cuppa, and therefore avoid them LOL


the whole punditry and commentary team waS yet again all english , they were even more boring than this kickathon
Think it was all english for france v all blacks too 
PATHETIC
ROYMOND MUNTER MBE (FOR SERVICES TO THE COMBOVER)
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
Rob Hunt View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 03 April 2020
Location: Burry Port
Status: Online
Points: 355 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rob Hunt Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 September 2023 at 5:07pm
Originally posted by roy munster roy munster wrote:

Originally posted by scarletpimp scarletpimp wrote:

The major downside of ITV coverage , is having Dallaglio and Woodward in the studio, particularly , when England are playing.
Luckily, I can dive into the kitchen during the break, to make a cuppa, and therefore avoid them LOL


the whole punditry and commentary team waS yet again all english , they were even more boring than this kickathon
Think it was all english for france v all blacks too 
PATHETIC
Just reading this post and below it is a sponsored link advertising season tickets for the parasites over the bridge!!??
Back to Top
SA14 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Wwwww mince

Joined: 15 August 2004
Location: Pemberton
Status: Offline
Points: 23419 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SA14 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 September 2023 at 5:40pm
Originally posted by Rob Hunt Rob Hunt wrote:

Originally posted by roy munster roy munster wrote:

Originally posted by scarletpimp scarletpimp wrote:

The major downside of ITV coverage , is having Dallaglio and Woodward in the studio, particularly , when England are playing.
Luckily, I can dive into the kitchen during the break, to make a cuppa, and therefore avoid them LOL


the whole punditry and commentary team waS yet again all english , they were even more boring than this kickathon
Think it was all english for france v all blacks too 
PATHETIC
Just reading this post and below it is a sponsored link advertising season tickets for the parasites over the bridge!!??

Tailored to your browsing habits. 
Back to Top
reesytheexile View Drop Down
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 11 August 2012
Location: Machynys
Status: Offline
Points: 16813 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote reesytheexile Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 September 2023 at 6:54pm
Originally posted by SA14 SA14 wrote:

Originally posted by Rob Hunt Rob Hunt wrote:

Originally posted by roy munster roy munster wrote:

Originally posted by scarletpimp scarletpimp wrote:

The major downside of ITV coverage , is having Dallaglio and Woodward in the studio, particularly , when England are playing.
Luckily, I can dive into the kitchen during the break, to make a cuppa, and therefore avoid them LOL


the whole punditry and commentary team waS yet again all english , they were even more boring than this kickathon
Think it was all english for france v all blacks too 
PATHETIC
Just reading this post and below it is a sponsored link advertising season tickets for the parasites over the bridge!!??

Tailored to your browsing habits. 
 

I’m more focused on the photos that “pop up” on SF which suggests a good deal of browsing interest by members in ladies clothing often of skimpy design! 😉 Any Eddie Izzards in the group perhaps or Grayson Perry’s ? 😉


Edited by reesytheexile - 10 September 2023 at 7:34pm
Back to Top
Wil Chips View Drop Down
Rambler
Rambler
Avatar

Joined: 23 August 2009
Location: Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 49886 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Wil Chips Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 September 2023 at 7:43pm
That’s probably my fault. At work my premier products were Calvin Klein, Victoria Secrets and Tommy Hilfiger lingerie. Sorry.
Back to Top
Tov View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 17 December 2022
Location: Moscow
Status: Offline
Points: 69 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tov Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 September 2023 at 11:57am
https://vk.com/rugbyonsofa are using the Stan Sports coverage, much better than ITV. Gareth Rees is excellent as a pundit and Schalk Brits gives proper insight into the scrums.
Back to Top
Mr Ian View Drop Down
Veteran
Veteran
Avatar

Joined: 06 February 2012
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 6966 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mr Ian Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 September 2023 at 12:36pm
Stan Sport the best images at the moment
Back to Top
aber-fan View Drop Down
Veteran
Veteran
Avatar

Joined: 25 October 2004
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 18334 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aber-fan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 September 2023 at 3:41pm
I saw little of this game, once I knew England had won by no tries to none. 

I do, however, have a major beef with the English media, who seem to be running a 'Curry was innocent - OK' sort of campaign. This is a total joke. Let's go through it one step at a time, for clarity:

1. Were they both competing for the ball? No - Mallia caught it, Curry came in to tackle.

2. Is Mallia much taller than Curry? No - Mallia 1.82m and Curry taller at 1.85m

3. Did Curry pause to check the head-height of Mallia before the hit? No.

4. Was there head-to-head contact? Yes.

5. Was Mallia injured in the collision? Yes!

6. Is there any mitigation in these circumstances? No. 

I have no idea why these clueless journos and so-called 'fans' are trying to claim that he should not have been red carded. Did he mean harm? I very much doubt it - but that's not the point, is it? It was reckless, for sure. Their argument seems to be that others 'got away' with similar challenges. My answer to that - they should spend time arguing that those others should have been red carded too, rather than that Curry was harshly treated.

Even some former England internationals agree - and I'm a bit surprised by their identity, TBH:

Chris Ashton (never my favourite) said: 
it is no longer "worth the risk" to tackle high in order to make "the perfect hit".

Looking at the specifics of Curry's dismissal, Ashton said: "Because Juan Cruz Mallia is coming down from so high, he has tried to time it perfectly. He is running the risk and it is a fine line these days.

"The game has changed and it is not worth the risk in order to time a perfect hit, when you can just let the player hit the floor and hit him lower."

And well-known clown Matt Dawson wrote:

It's very much an individual mindset, shown by that incident where both Elliot Daly and Tom Curry have gone in to smash Juan Cruz Mallia.

Daly has got it spot on and is bent over, hinged at the hips and sinking low, so even if Mallia catches the ball and goes into a position where the winger hits him in the head there is mitigation because of the position he is in.

That probably doesn't help Curry's case, because the television match official is seeing one England player get it right and one who hasn't. His body is not hinged enough, therefore he is never going to get low enough and by the letter of the law that is a red card.

If even two dyed in the wool wearers of the Union Jack feel that the red was a correct decision, what sort of people are these on social media who argue otherwise? Career head-hunters?
“You cannot reason a man out of what he never reasoned himself into.” (Jonathan Swift)
Back to Top
ap sior View Drop Down
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 08 May 2005
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 11126 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ap sior Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 September 2023 at 3:57pm
Originally posted by aber-fan aber-fan wrote:

I saw little of this game, once I knew England had won by no tries to none. 

I do, however, have a major beef with the English media, who seem to be running a 'Curry was innocent - OK' sort of campaign. This is a total joke. Let's go through it one step at a time, for clarity:

1. Were they both competing for the ball? No - Mallia caught it, Curry came in to tackle.

2. Is Mallia much taller than Curry? No - Mallia 1.82m and Curry taller at 1.85m

3. Did Curry pause to check the head-height of Mallia before the hit? No.

4. Was there head-to-head contact? Yes.

5. Was Mallia injured in the collision? Yes!

6. Is there any mitigation in these circumstances? No. 

I have no idea why these clueless journos and so-called 'fans' are trying to claim that he should not have been red carded. Did he mean harm? I very much doubt it - but that's not the point, is it? It was reckless, for sure. Their argument seems to be that others 'got away' with similar challenges. My answer to that - they should spend time arguing that those others should have been red carded too, rather than that Curry was harshly treated.

Even some former England internationals agree - and I'm a bit surprised by their identity, TBH:

Chris Ashton (never my favourite) said: 
it is no longer "worth the risk" to tackle high in order to make "the perfect hit".

Looking at the specifics of Curry's dismissal, Ashton said: "Because Juan Cruz Mallia is coming down from so high, he has tried to time it perfectly. He is running the risk and it is a fine line these days.

"The game has changed and it is not worth the risk in order to time a perfect hit, when you can just let the player hit the floor and hit him lower."

And well-known clown Matt Dawson wrote:

It's very much an individual mindset, shown by that incident where both Elliot Daly and Tom Curry have gone in to smash Juan Cruz Mallia.

Daly has got it spot on and is bent over, hinged at the hips and sinking low, so even if Mallia catches the ball and goes into a position where the winger hits him in the head there is mitigation because of the position he is in.

That probably doesn't help Curry's case, because the television match official is seeing one England player get it right and one who hasn't. His body is not hinged enough, therefore he is never going to get low enough and by the letter of the law that is a red card.

If even two dyed in the wool wearers of the Union Jack feel that the red was a correct decision, what sort of people are these on social media who argue otherwise? Career head-hunters?

3 who argued against a red were in the studio, Dallaglio, Woodward and Wilkinson.

They all seemed to suggest that Mallia was at fault as he had lowered his height. Mallia did come down from height, but didn't 'dip' after his feet hit the ground. My thoughts were that Curry came in at head height, so therefore he was at fault. I thought that it was a red, I also thought that Kriel's tackle on Dempsey was a red.
Back to Top
aber-fan View Drop Down
Veteran
Veteran
Avatar

Joined: 25 October 2004
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 18334 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aber-fan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 September 2023 at 8:06pm
Originally posted by ap sior ap sior wrote:

Originally posted by aber-fan aber-fan wrote:

I saw little of this game, once I knew England had won by no tries to none. 

I do, however, have a major beef with the English media, who seem to be running a 'Curry was innocent - OK' sort of campaign. This is a total joke. Let's go through it one step at a time, for clarity:

1. Were they both competing for the ball? No - Mallia caught it, Curry came in to tackle.

2. Is Mallia much taller than Curry? No - Mallia 1.82m and Curry taller at 1.85m

3. Did Curry pause to check the head-height of Mallia before the hit? No.

4. Was there head-to-head contact? Yes.

5. Was Mallia injured in the collision? Yes!

6. Is there any mitigation in these circumstances? No. 

I have no idea why these clueless journos and so-called 'fans' are trying to claim that he should not have been red carded. Did he mean harm? I very much doubt it - but that's not the point, is it? It was reckless, for sure. Their argument seems to be that others 'got away' with similar challenges. My answer to that - they should spend time arguing that those others should have been red carded too, rather than that Curry was harshly treated.

Even some former England internationals agree - and I'm a bit surprised by their identity, TBH:

Chris Ashton (never my favourite) said: 
it is no longer "worth the risk" to tackle high in order to make "the perfect hit".

Looking at the specifics of Curry's dismissal, Ashton said: "Because Juan Cruz Mallia is coming down from so high, he has tried to time it perfectly. He is running the risk and it is a fine line these days.

"The game has changed and it is not worth the risk in order to time a perfect hit, when you can just let the player hit the floor and hit him lower."

And well-known clown Matt Dawson wrote:

It's very much an individual mindset, shown by that incident where both Elliot Daly and Tom Curry have gone in to smash Juan Cruz Mallia.

Daly has got it spot on and is bent over, hinged at the hips and sinking low, so even if Mallia catches the ball and goes into a position where the winger hits him in the head there is mitigation because of the position he is in.

That probably doesn't help Curry's case, because the television match official is seeing one England player get it right and one who hasn't. His body is not hinged enough, therefore he is never going to get low enough and by the letter of the law that is a red card.

If even two dyed in the wool wearers of the Union Jack feel that the red was a correct decision, what sort of people are these on social media who argue otherwise? Career head-hunters?

3 who argued against a red were in the studio, Dallaglio, Woodward and Wilkinson.

They all seemed to suggest that Mallia was at fault as he had lowered his height. Mallia did come down from height, but didn't 'dip' after his feet hit the ground. My thoughts were that Curry came in at head height, so therefore he was at fault. I thought that it was a red, I also thought that Kriel's tackle on Dempsey was a red.

It should be obvious to even a one-eyed idiot that if you run into someone of the same height as yourself without bending at the waist, a head collision is inevitable! You can hardly blame the guy who jumped and caught the ball either - he's not looking down but up. 

What. A. Bunch. Of. Clowns!
“You cannot reason a man out of what he never reasoned himself into.” (Jonathan Swift)
Back to Top
Rob Hunt View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 03 April 2020
Location: Burry Port
Status: Online
Points: 355 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rob Hunt Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 September 2023 at 4:53pm
Curry given two game ban.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.219 seconds.