Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Wasp
Veteran
Joined: 29 April 2008
Location: Sunny Pembs
Status: Offline
Points: 16374
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2022 at 2:04pm |
I hope we don’t have too many unvaccinated players. They’ll be unable to go.
|
We're still still here!
|
 |
Sponsored Links
|
|
 |
Huwbach
Veteran
Joined: 20 January 2007
Location: underthebridge
Status: Offline
Points: 4882
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2022 at 2:21pm |
Wasp wrote:
I hope we don’t have too many unvaccinated players. They’ll be unable to go.
We have a few according to Peel but should be ok - a bit telling though.
|
|
 |
tannerbankboy
Veteran
Joined: 05 May 2005
Location: Mynydd Mawr
Status: Offline
Points: 2816
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2022 at 3:08pm |
GPR - Rochester wrote:
Seagultaf wrote:
Fscarlet wrote:
Seagultaf wrote:
Fscarlet wrote:
France opens its border to UK holiday makers from tomorrow, no quarantine but must show negative test taken within 24 hours of departure.
Game on! |
Its my understanding that Unvaccinated travelers still have to self isolate. Is that correct?
If so that would mean that any individuals in the Scarlets party who are not fully vaccinated will be unable to travel. |
Those who are un-vaccinated must provide an essential reason as to why they are entering France.
ETA: Unsure if that means they have to self isolate.
|
The link to the BBC article is below. The concerning statement is that, Unvaccinated travelers need a compelling reason to travel and must still isolate for 10 days on arrival. Surely that would exclude any non triple jabbed Scarlets players and support team members from traveling to France?
|
Any of our intended travelling party who are not fully vaccinated and do not pass a test within 24 hours of travel will not be going to Bordeaux. That is pretty reasonable now that the silly 48 hour quarantine has been dropped. |
If that's the case anyone unable to travel shouldn't be paid for the time they are unavailable. It's their right to be unvaccinated but I don't see why employers and colleagues should suffer as a result.
|
 |
Fscarlet
Moderator Group
Joined: 26 January 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 7061
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2022 at 3:14pm |
tannerbankboy wrote:
If that's the case anyone unable to travel shouldn't be paid for the time they are unavailable. It's their right to be unvaccinated but I don't see why employers and colleagues should suffer as a result. |
That raises a valid point, some employers (Ikea & Next to name a couple) have said they won't pay sick pay for unvaccinated staff if they have to isolate as a result of contracting COVID.
|
 |
Why
Veteran
Joined: 22 August 2010
Status: Online
Points: 7388
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2022 at 3:21pm |
tannerbankboy wrote:
GPR - Rochester wrote:
Seagultaf wrote:
Fscarlet wrote:
Seagultaf wrote:
Fscarlet wrote:
France opens its border to UK holiday makers from tomorrow, no quarantine but must show negative test taken within 24 hours of departure.
Game on! |
Its my understanding that Unvaccinated travelers still have to self isolate. Is that correct?
If so that would mean that any individuals in the Scarlets party who are not fully vaccinated will be unable to travel. |
Those who are un-vaccinated must provide an essential reason as to why they are entering France.
ETA: Unsure if that means they have to self isolate.
|
The link to the BBC article is below. The concerning statement is that, Unvaccinated travelers need a compelling reason to travel and must still isolate for 10 days on arrival. Surely that would exclude any non triple jabbed Scarlets players and support team members from traveling to France?
|
Any of our intended travelling party who are not fully vaccinated and do not pass a test within 24 hours of travel will not be going to Bordeaux. That is pretty reasonable now that the silly 48 hour quarantine has been dropped. |
If that's the case anyone unable to travel shouldn't be paid for the time they are unavailable. It's their right to be unvaccinated but I don't see why employers and colleagues should suffer as a result. |
Absolute nonsense they didn’t know the rules which change every day seemingly and can’t have three vaccines in 24 hours. We live in a free country people should have choice what to put in their bodies without fear of being punished if they don’t. I am fully vaccinated and believe in them but will fight for the rights of others to choose.
|
She asks why i still can't answer. I guess its in the blood.
|
 |
GPR - Rochester
Veteran
Joined: 01 December 2014
Location: Rhydcymerau
Status: Offline
Points: 14361
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2022 at 3:26pm |
Why wrote:
tannerbankboy wrote:
GPR - Rochester wrote:
Seagultaf wrote:
Fscarlet wrote:
Seagultaf wrote:
[QUOTE=Fscarlet]France opens its border to UK holiday makers from tomorrow, no quarantine but must show negative test taken within 24 hours of departure.
Game on! |
Its my understanding that Unvaccinated travelers still have to self isolate. Is that correct?
If so that would mean that any individuals in the Scarlets party who are not fully vaccinated will be unable to travel. |
Those who are un-vaccinated must provide an essential reason as to why they are entering France.
ETA: Unsure if that means they have to self isolate.
|
The link to the BBC article is below. The concerning statement is that, Unvaccinated travelers need a compelling reason to travel and must still isolate for 10 days on arrival. Surely that would exclude any non triple jabbed Scarlets players and support team members from traveling to France?
|
Any of our intended travelling party who are not fully vaccinated and do not pass a test within 24 hours of travel will not be going to Bordeaux. That is pretty reasonable now that the silly 48 hour quarantine has been dropped. |
If that's the case anyone unable to travel shouldn't be paid for the time they are unavailable. It's their right to be unvaccinated but I don't see why employers and colleagues should suffer as a result. |
Absolute nonsense they didn’t know the rules which change every day seemingly and can’t have three vaccines in 24 hours. We live in a free country people should have choice what to put in their bodies without fear of being punished if they don’t. I am fully vaccinated and believe in them but will fight for the rights of others to choose.
[/QUOTe
I don't want to make a habit of this Why but I tend to agree with you. Its a different matter if your contract specifies this but I doubt they do. In this instance not being able to take part is punishment enough.
|
 |
reesytheexile
Veteran
Joined: 11 August 2012
Location: Machynys
Status: Offline
Points: 15413
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2022 at 3:44pm |
Why wrote:
tannerbankboy wrote:
GPR - Rochester wrote:
Seagultaf wrote:
Fscarlet wrote:
Seagultaf wrote:
Fscarlet wrote:
France opens its border to UK holiday makers from tomorrow, no quarantine but must show negative test taken within 24 hours of departure.
Game on! |
Its my understanding that Unvaccinated travelers still have to self isolate. Is that correct?
If so that would mean that any individuals in the Scarlets party who are not fully vaccinated will be unable to travel. |
Those who are un-vaccinated must provide an essential reason as to why they are entering France.
ETA: Unsure if that means they have to self isolate.
|
The link to the BBC article is below. The concerning statement is that, Unvaccinated travelers need a compelling reason to travel and must still isolate for 10 days on arrival. Surely that would exclude any non triple jabbed Scarlets players and support team members from traveling to France?
|
Any of our intended travelling party who are not fully vaccinated and do not pass a test within 24 hours of travel will not be going to Bordeaux. That is pretty reasonable now that the silly 48 hour quarantine has been dropped. |
If that's the case anyone unable to travel shouldn't be paid for the time they are unavailable. It's their right to be unvaccinated but I don't see why employers and colleagues should suffer as a result. |
Absolute nonsense they didn’t know the rules which change every day seemingly and can’t have three vaccines in 24 hours. We live in a free country people should have choice what to put in their bodies without fear of being punished if they don’t. I am fully vaccinated and believe in them but will fight for the rights of others to choose.
|
Yep and to hell with the overstretched NHS staff who may have to mop their feared brows I assume? Sorry, I disagree and I will fight for the rights of the NHS workers over these selfish anti societal people (Just my opinion of course  )
|
"I'd rather have been a judge than a miner.Being a miner,as soon as you are too old and tired and sick and stupid to do the job properly,you have to go.The very opposite applies with judges!"P.Cook
|
 |
Mugwuffin
Veteran
Joined: 24 July 2010
Location: Llanelli
Status: Offline
Points: 6410
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2022 at 4:28pm |
Wasp wrote:
I hope we don’t have too many unvaccinated players. They’ll be unable to go.
|
”A couple” is what Peel answered when asked before the Ospreys match.
|
 |
Jones2004
Veteran
Joined: 29 September 2019
Location: North Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 1370
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2022 at 5:31pm |
For now I’d agree that unvaccinated players should still be paid but when the next contract negotiations come up the club would be well within their right to say that if an unvaccinated player misses a game because they are unvaccinated they won’t get paid. It would still offer them free choice, but emphasise that there are consequences to being unvaccinated.
|
 |
supertaf
Veteran
Joined: 17 August 2004
Location: Down the Parc
Status: Offline
Points: 8720
|
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2022 at 5:46pm |
Why wrote:
tannerbankboy wrote:
GPR - Rochester wrote:
Seagultaf wrote:
Fscarlet wrote:
Seagultaf wrote:
Fscarlet wrote:
France opens its border to UK holiday makers from tomorrow, no quarantine but must show negative test taken within 24 hours of departure.
Game on! |
Its my understanding that Unvaccinated travelers still have to self isolate. Is that correct?
If so that would mean that any individuals in the Scarlets party who are not fully vaccinated will be unable to travel. |
Those who are un-vaccinated must provide an essential reason as to why they are entering France.
ETA: Unsure if that means they have to self isolate.
|
The link to the BBC article is below. The concerning statement is that, Unvaccinated travelers need a compelling reason to travel and must still isolate for 10 days on arrival. Surely that would exclude any non triple jabbed Scarlets players and support team members from traveling to France?
|
Any of our intended travelling party who are not fully vaccinated and do not pass a test within 24 hours of travel will not be going to Bordeaux. That is pretty reasonable now that the silly 48 hour quarantine has been dropped. |
If that's the case anyone unable to travel shouldn't be paid for the time they are unavailable. It's their right to be unvaccinated but I don't see why employers and colleagues should suffer as a result. |
Absolute nonsense they didn’t know the rules which change every day seemingly and can’t have three vaccines in 24 hours. We live in a free country people should have choice what to put in their bodies without fear of being punished if they don’t. I am fully vaccinated and believe in them but will fight for the rights of others to choose.
|
My view is, we are currently in this sh1te mainly due to hospitals being full of unvaccinated people who are ill with covid. Why arent people angry with those people? I dont get it. I find it hugely frustrating to the point where I honestly feel, if you choose not to be vaccinated and get ill, you should pay for your treatment. Yes its 100% your choice, but there are consequences.
|
Scarlets - Suppliers of fine rugby since 1872
|
 |
Why
Veteran
Joined: 22 August 2010
Status: Online
Points: 7388
|
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2022 at 5:48pm |
supertaf wrote:
Why wrote:
tannerbankboy wrote:
GPR - Rochester wrote:
Seagultaf wrote:
Fscarlet wrote:
Seagultaf wrote:
Fscarlet wrote:
France opens its border to UK holiday makers from tomorrow, no quarantine but must show negative test taken within 24 hours of departure.
Game on! |
Its my understanding that Unvaccinated travelers still have to self isolate. Is that correct?
If so that would mean that any individuals in the Scarlets party who are not fully vaccinated will be unable to travel. |
Those who are un-vaccinated must provide an essential reason as to why they are entering France.
ETA: Unsure if that means they have to self isolate.
|
The link to the BBC article is below. The concerning statement is that, Unvaccinated travelers need a compelling reason to travel and must still isolate for 10 days on arrival. Surely that would exclude any non triple jabbed Scarlets players and support team members from traveling to France?
|
Any of our intended travelling party who are not fully vaccinated and do not pass a test within 24 hours of travel will not be going to Bordeaux. That is pretty reasonable now that the silly 48 hour quarantine has been dropped. |
If that's the case anyone unable to travel shouldn't be paid for the time they are unavailable. It's their right to be unvaccinated but I don't see why employers and colleagues should suffer as a result. |
Absolute nonsense they didn’t know the rules which change every day seemingly and can’t have three vaccines in 24 hours. We live in a free country people should have choice what to put in their bodies without fear of being punished if they don’t. I am fully vaccinated and believe in them but will fight for the rights of others to choose.
|
My view is, we are currently in this sh1te mainly due to hospitals being full of unvaccinated people who are ill with covid. Why arent people angry with those people? I dont get it. I find it hugely frustrating to the point where I honestly feel, if you choose not to be vaccinated and get ill, you should pay for your treatment. Yes its 100% your choice, but there are consequences. |
Drug addicts, alcoholics and smokers all to pay for their treatment as well I take it then.
|
She asks why i still can't answer. I guess its in the blood.
|
 |
Wil Chips
Rambler
Joined: 23 August 2009
Location: Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 47576
|
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2022 at 5:50pm |
Jones2004 wrote:
For now I’d agree that unvaccinated players should still be paid but when the next contract negotiations come up the club would be well within their right to say that if an unvaccinated player misses a game because they are unvaccinated they won’t get paid. It would still offer them free choice, but emphasise that there are consequences to being unvaccinated. | NFL have gone a step further. If a game is called off due to an unvaccinated player(s) testing positive. The team with the cases forfeit the have to pay any lost income to the opposing club. Net result is that agents are dropping unvaccinated players as they will become impossible to get a contract extension or transfer.
|
 |
Wasp
Veteran
Joined: 29 April 2008
Location: Sunny Pembs
Status: Offline
Points: 16374
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2022 at 5:50pm |
Why wrote:
supertaf wrote:
Why wrote:
tannerbankboy wrote:
GPR - Rochester wrote:
Seagultaf wrote:
Fscarlet wrote:
Seagultaf wrote:
Fscarlet wrote:
France opens its border to UK holiday makers from tomorrow, no quarantine but must show negative test taken within 24 hours of departure.
Game on! |
Its my understanding that Unvaccinated travelers still have to self isolate. Is that correct?
If so that would mean that any individuals in the Scarlets party who are not fully vaccinated will be unable to travel. |
Those who are un-vaccinated must provide an essential reason as to why they are entering France.
ETA: Unsure if that means they have to self isolate.
|
The link to the BBC article is below. The concerning statement is that, Unvaccinated travelers need a compelling reason to travel and must still isolate for 10 days on arrival. Surely that would exclude any non triple jabbed Scarlets players and support team members from traveling to France?
|
Any of our intended travelling party who are not fully vaccinated and do not pass a test within 24 hours of travel will not be going to Bordeaux. That is pretty reasonable now that the silly 48 hour quarantine has been dropped. |
If that's the case anyone unable to travel shouldn't be paid for the time they are unavailable. It's their right to be unvaccinated but I don't see why employers and colleagues should suffer as a result. |
Absolute nonsense they didn’t know the rules which change every day seemingly and can’t have three vaccines in 24 hours. We live in a free country people should have choice what to put in their bodies without fear of being punished if they don’t. I am fully vaccinated and believe in them but will fight for the rights of others to choose.
|
My view is, we are currently in this sh1te mainly due to hospitals being full of unvaccinated people who are ill with covid. Why arent people angry with those people? I dont get it. I find it hugely frustrating to the point where I honestly feel, if you choose not to be vaccinated and get ill, you should pay for your treatment. Yes its 100% your choice, but there are consequences. |
Drug addicts, alcoholics and smokers all to pay for their treatment as well I take it then. |
And rugby players?
|
We're still still here!
|
 |
Eastern outpost
Veteran
Joined: 13 March 2012
Location: South Suffolk
Status: Offline
Points: 18249
|
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2022 at 6:16pm |
supertaf wrote:
Why wrote:
tannerbankboy wrote:
GPR - Rochester wrote:
Seagultaf wrote:
Fscarlet wrote:
Seagultaf wrote:
Fscarlet wrote:
France opens its border to UK holiday makers from tomorrow, no quarantine but must show negative test taken within 24 hours of departure.
Game on! |
Its my understanding that Unvaccinated travelers still have to self isolate. Is that correct?
If so that would mean that any individuals in the Scarlets party who are not fully vaccinated will be unable to travel. |
Those who are un-vaccinated must provide an essential reason as to why they are entering France.
ETA: Unsure if that means they have to self isolate.
|
The link to the BBC article is below. The concerning statement is that, Unvaccinated travelers need a compelling reason to travel and must still isolate for 10 days on arrival. Surely that would exclude any non triple jabbed Scarlets players and support team members from traveling to France?
|
Any of our intended travelling party who are not fully vaccinated and do not pass a test within 24 hours of travel will not be going to Bordeaux. That is pretty reasonable now that the silly 48 hour quarantine has been dropped. |
If that's the case anyone unable to travel shouldn't be paid for the time they are unavailable. It's their right to be unvaccinated but I don't see why employers and colleagues should suffer as a result. |
Absolute nonsense they didn’t know the rules which change every day seemingly and can’t have three vaccines in 24 hours. We live in a free country people should have choice what to put in their bodies without fear of being punished if they don’t. I am fully vaccinated and believe in them but will fight for the rights of others to choose.
|
My view is, we are currently in this sh1te mainly due to hospitals being full of unvaccinated people who are ill with covid. Why arent people angry with those people? I dont get it. I find it hugely frustrating to the point where I honestly feel, if you choose not to be vaccinated and get ill, you should pay for your treatment. Yes its 100% your choice, but there are consequences. |
I share your frustration at the non-vaccinated.
My reaction depends on whether I know the person or if it’s just an en-masse anti-vaxxer like Piers Corbyn.
One our best friends in France refused to be jabbed so he never went near a restaurant etc after 1st August. He died last week. He’d been ill for a while and didn’t really want to take his medicine. In turns, very frustrating, sad but ultimately his choice and we respected that.
Those that deny the virus’s existence and come up with all sorts of illogical reasons to avoid vaccination, I just don’t understand.
While freedom of choice should exist to a certain extent, if the use of that choice leads to persistently or extreme examples of bad choice, there should be sanctions.
While we might think supporting the Ospreys is not very logical, it is a choice that has little consequential impact. So a “go ahead if you really must” kind of choice and yes I know they’d say the same about us.
Someone who objects to the govt and goes about blowing up people and places or carries put random assaults and killings needs their choice punished heavily.
Someone choosing not to vaccinate falls somewhere in between. Exercising that choice would have vastly differing consequences for them depending on their location. Wil and others could add some specifics to this.
If the government insisted on a vaccine confirmation document for all restaurants, bars etc, the hospitality sector could carry on without fear of having to shut down. It would act as an incentive to weaken the resolve of the anti-vaxxers.
Macron wants to turn the screw on the unvaccinated in France and has said so. Some other friends of ours over there have only recently got jabbed. Claiming it was anti Buddhist, which it may well be, to get vaccinated, they got fed up with not seeing their vaccinated friends nor going into a restaurant.
Calling into our local garage on the way home this pm, the owner’s son and wife recently got back from the Caribbean and have come down with Covid. They’re both vaccinated and are struggling with the symptoms. It’d have been even worse if they’d not been jabbed.
If the cabinet weren’t formed from such a narrow range of views and backgrounds, there’d probably be a harder line taken on the vaccine, or maybe not…………..
|
In a world where you can be anything – Be Kind.
|
 |
ladram
Rambler
Joined: 08 April 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 25261
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2022 at 6:24pm |
supertaf wrote:
Why wrote:
tannerbankboy wrote:
GPR - Rochester wrote:
Seagultaf wrote:
Fscarlet wrote:
Seagultaf wrote:
Fscarlet wrote:
France opens its border to UK holiday makers from tomorrow, no quarantine but must show negative test taken within 24 hours of departure.
Game on! |
Its my understanding that Unvaccinated travelers still have to self isolate. Is that correct?
If so that would mean that any individuals in the Scarlets party who are not fully vaccinated will be unable to travel. |
Those who are un-vaccinated must provide an essential reason as to why they are entering France.
ETA: Unsure if that means they have to self isolate.
|
The link to the BBC article is below. The concerning statement is that, Unvaccinated travelers need a compelling reason to travel and must still isolate for 10 days on arrival. Surely that would exclude any non triple jabbed Scarlets players and support team members from traveling to France?
|
Any of our intended travelling party who are not fully vaccinated and do not pass a test within 24 hours of travel will not be going to Bordeaux. That is pretty reasonable now that the silly 48 hour quarantine has been dropped. |
If that's the case anyone unable to travel shouldn't be paid for the time they are unavailable. It's their right to be unvaccinated but I don't see why employers and colleagues should suffer as a result. |
Absolute nonsense they didn’t know the rules which change every day seemingly and can’t have three vaccines in 24 hours. We live in a free country people should have choice what to put in their bodies without fear of being punished if they don’t. I am fully vaccinated and believe in them but will fight for the rights of others to choose.
|
My view is, we are currently in this sh1te mainly due to hospitals being full of unvaccinated people who are ill with covid. Why arent people angry with those people? I dont get it. I find it hugely frustrating to the point where I honestly feel, if you choose not to be vaccinated and get ill, you should pay for your treatment. Yes its 100% your choice, but there are consequences. |

|
 |
Why
Veteran
Joined: 22 August 2010
Status: Online
Points: 7388
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2022 at 7:02pm |
There is a huge problem in the ethnic community with their religious leaders peddling anti vaccine material. My neighbour is a Muslim and unvaccinated because of the teaching in his mosque and is very confused about what to do. He also has a severely disabled daughter who can’t be vaccinated yet has to go to hospital regularly. Should he be castigated possibly but please look at the situation from others perspective before judging.
|
She asks why i still can't answer. I guess its in the blood.
|
 |