Bordeaux game at risk

Wasp wrote: I hope we don’t have too many unvaccinated players. They’ll be unable to go. We have a few according to Peel but should be ok - a bit telling though.

tannerbankboy wrote: If that's the case anyone unable to travel shouldn't be paid for the time they are unavailable.  It's their right to be unvaccinated but I don't see why employers and colleagues should suffer as a result.

Why wrote: tannerbankboy wrote: GPR - Rochester wrote: Seagultaf wrote: Fscarlet wrote: Seagultaf wrote: [QUOTE=Fscarlet]France opens its border to UK holiday makers from tomorrow, no quarantine but must show negative test taken within 24 hours of departure. Game on! Its my understanding that Unvaccinated travelers still have to self isolate. Is that correct? If so that would mean that any individuals in the Scarlets party who are not fully vaccinated will be unable to travel. Those who are un-vaccinated must provide an essential reason as to why they are entering France. ETA: Unsure if that means they have to self isolate. The link to the BBC article is below. The concerning statement is that, Unvaccinated travelers need a compelling reason to travel and must still isolate for 10 days on arrival. Surely that would exclude any non triple jabbed Scarlets players and support team members from traveling to France? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-59977978 Any of our intended travelling party who are not fully vaccinated and do not pass a test within 24 hours of travel will not be going to Bordeaux. That is pretty reasonable now that the silly 48 hour quarantine has been dropped.  If that's the case anyone unable to travel shouldn't be paid for the time they are unavailable.  It's their right to be unvaccinated but I don't see why employers and colleagues should suffer as a result.

[/QUOTe

Wasp wrote: I hope we don’t have too many unvaccinated players. They’ll be unable to go.

”A couple” is what Peel answered when asked before the Ospreys match. 

Why wrote: tannerbankboy wrote: GPR - Rochester wrote: Seagultaf wrote: Fscarlet wrote: Seagultaf wrote: Fscarlet wrote: France opens its border to UK holiday makers from tomorrow, no quarantine but must show negative test taken within 24 hours of departure. Game on! Its my understanding that Unvaccinated travelers still have to self isolate. Is that correct? If so that would mean that any individuals in the Scarlets party who are not fully vaccinated will be unable to travel. Those who are un-vaccinated must provide an essential reason as to why they are entering France. ETA: Unsure if that means they have to self isolate. The link to the BBC article is below. The concerning statement is that, Unvaccinated travelers need a compelling reason to travel and must still isolate for 10 days on arrival. Surely that would exclude any non triple jabbed Scarlets players and support team members from traveling to France? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-59977978 Any of our intended travelling party who are not fully vaccinated and do not pass a test within 24 hours of travel will not be going to Bordeaux. That is pretty reasonable now that the silly 48 hour quarantine has been dropped.  If that's the case anyone unable to travel shouldn't be paid for the time they are unavailable.  It's their right to be unvaccinated but I don't see why employers and colleagues should suffer as a result. Absolute nonsense they didn’t know the rules which change every day seemingly and can’t have three vaccines in 24 hours. We live in a free country people should have choice what to put in their bodies without fear of being punished if they don’t.  I am fully vaccinated and believe in them but will fight for the rights of others to choose.

Jones2004 wrote: For now I’d agree that unvaccinated players should still be paid but when the next contract negotiations come up the club would be well within their right to say that if an unvaccinated player misses a game because they are unvaccinated they won’t get paid. It would still offer them free choice, but emphasise that there are consequences to being unvaccinated.

NFL have gone a step further. If a game is called off due to an unvaccinated player(s) testing positive. The team with the cases forfeit the have to pay any lost income to the opposing club.
Net result is that agents are dropping unvaccinated players as they will become impossible to get a contract extension or transfer.

supertaf wrote: Why wrote: tannerbankboy wrote: GPR - Rochester wrote: Seagultaf wrote: Fscarlet wrote: Seagultaf wrote: Fscarlet wrote: France opens its border to UK holiday makers from tomorrow, no quarantine but must show negative test taken within 24 hours of departure. Game on! Its my understanding that Unvaccinated travelers still have to self isolate. Is that correct? If so that would mean that any individuals in the Scarlets party who are not fully vaccinated will be unable to travel. Those who are un-vaccinated must provide an essential reason as to why they are entering France. ETA: Unsure if that means they have to self isolate. The link to the BBC article is below. The concerning statement is that, Unvaccinated travelers need a compelling reason to travel and must still isolate for 10 days on arrival. Surely that would exclude any non triple jabbed Scarlets players and support team members from traveling to France? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-59977978 Any of our intended travelling party who are not fully vaccinated and do not pass a test within 24 hours of travel will not be going to Bordeaux. That is pretty reasonable now that the silly 48 hour quarantine has been dropped.  If that's the case anyone unable to travel shouldn't be paid for the time they are unavailable.  It's their right to be unvaccinated but I don't see why employers and colleagues should suffer as a result. Absolute nonsense they didn’t know the rules which change every day seemingly and can’t have three vaccines in 24 hours. We live in a free country people should have choice what to put in their bodies without fear of being punished if they don’t.  I am fully vaccinated and believe in them but will fight for the rights of others to choose.  My view is, we are currently in this sh1te mainly due to hospitals being full of unvaccinated people who are ill with covid. Why arent people angry with those people? I dont get it. I find it hugely frustrating to the point where I honestly feel, if you choose not to be vaccinated and get ill, you should pay for your treatment. Yes its 100% your choice, but there are consequences.

I share your frustration at the non-vaccinated. 

There is a huge problem in the ethnic community with their religious leaders peddling anti vaccine material. My neighbour is a Muslim and unvaccinated because of the teaching in his mosque and is very confused about what to do. He also has a severely disabled daughter who can’t be vaccinated yet has to go to hospital regularly. Should he be castigated possibly but please look at the situation from others perspective before judging.