Scarlet Fever Llanelli Rugby Sport Wales Tickets Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > SOCIAL > ORDERED
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Condolences sites and threads
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login


Condolences sites and threads

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
dr_martinov View Drop Down
Veteran
Veteran
Avatar

Joined: 06 August 2005
Location: Tycoch
Status: Offline
Points: 13608
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dr_martinov Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Condolences sites and threads
    Posted: 20 June 2012 at 10:50am
This is a topic intended to provoke debate, not argument, and I will state I really don't wish to read any nasty comments about recently deceased individuals. This is spurred by the Maynard RIP thread but by no means do I mean any disrespect or lack of sympathy to him or his family. This is about people's reactions in the online community to such events and only that.

So, I have been interested in seeing how people react to the sad news of death online; be it celebrity, tragic, or self-destructive, and the contrast to how they would act in real life to people they actually encounter.

For example, a great deal of sadness was expressed over Whitney Houston's death when clearly she had a cocaine problem. Do the people have the same sympathy towards habitual drug users who happen to have less money and so are begging in the streets? Similar for Amy Winehouse - those that said fairly cold things such as "not much of a surprise" got a lot of flak.

There was the tragic shooting of a man next to his wife recently... but that man was Osama bin Laden and so it was celebrated the world over. 

I felt great sadness when Leslie Neilsen died because the Naked Gun and Airplane films are some of my favourite ever and he seemed like a pretty nice guy so I understand the motivation to set up tribute sites and to feel emotion over someone you haven't personally met's demise. But I keep this in perspective and celebrate what I liked about him, I wasn't crying as I would if it had been a friend's death, but I was still sad based on my enjoyment of his acting career.

And, when we compare the above examples, what the people have done in their lives and the situation of their deaths clearly is a factor, e.g. Amy Winehouse made some songs that a lot of people have heard, the drug user and alcoholic unemployed guy on the street did not - so does that justify her life being mourned more than theirs? I think society has said that it does. Whether that is right or wrong isn't for me to say.

And then I get around to my main point: the need of people to post RIP threads or post on them. I feel great sympathy for Tom Maynard and his family, as 23 is a very young age, but I will admit I had not heard of him before and feel no personal attachment and thus no need to post upon the thread. I suspect if you went across the online community, many who do post on these type of things are also within this category, so what motivates them to? Not to mention the public hysteria over massive celebrities such as Diana or Michael Jackson - people actually crying in the street over who is, at the end of the day, a distant figure to them? Why do they need to do this?

I think it's actually a pack thing in that once one person (who may actually care a lot) has done something, a second group of people who know the first then follow initially as a gesture of support but then out of blind instinct many others will do so. Numerous Facebook RIP pages to non-celebrity youths who died in tragic circumstances with thousands of people who never knew them adding messages of support would back up this idea.

In turn this has given birth to the nastiest of internet trolling: the defecation of condolence sites with very sick and upsetting jokes. The people who do this use the argument I have outlined above (i.e. that the messages of support are empty gestures) to justify such a behaviour and, while I certainly do not condone this behaviour in the slightest, they do have a small point with this and it does explain their back-reaction to this insincerity they perceive.

I dislike the way the media milk this public opinion and spur it on as well, newspapers such as the Daily Mail still going on and on about Diana, not to mention the antics of pop stars such as Elton John (oh yeah, I'll re-release a song I wrote about Marilyn Monroe and make even more money and fame for myself).

I repeat that I am not posting anything nasty or offensive about those that have died, and certainly do not wish to provoke such comments, this thread is merely expressing my objective interest in how "society" and the online community behaves towards such events - in some ways I'm curious because I don't understand them (I am a scientist and thus lack key social skills such as empathy) so would be interested to hear the views of others.
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
scarlet96 View Drop Down
Veteran
Veteran
Avatar

Joined: 14 August 2010
Location: Scarlet Land
Status: Offline
Points: 2018
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote scarlet96 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 June 2012 at 10:59am
I understand everything you have said and accept it !!
The reason I made those threads was because I was a big Tom Maynard fan and watched him grow into a county cricket icon soon to be a international icon and wanted to let people know about the tragic news and what others thought of him !!
Back to Top
dr_martinov View Drop Down
Veteran
Veteran
Avatar

Joined: 06 August 2005
Location: Tycoch
Status: Offline
Points: 13608
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dr_martinov Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 June 2012 at 11:16am
Which is completely fair enough, this thread certainly wasn't a criticism of yourself 69 or the thread you created; it was the discussion that emerged within it that prompted me to write some of my thoughts down.
Back to Top
scarlet96 View Drop Down
Veteran
Veteran
Avatar

Joined: 14 August 2010
Location: Scarlet Land
Status: Offline
Points: 2018
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote scarlet96 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 June 2012 at 11:20am
Originally posted by dr_martinov dr_martinov wrote:

Which is completely fair enough, this thread certainly wasn't a criticism of yourself 69 or the thread you created; it was the discussion that emerged within it that prompted me to write some of my thoughts down.

Okay, some of the comments was out of control IMO !!
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 June 2012 at 11:24am
Originally posted by dr_martinov dr_martinov wrote:

For example, a great deal of sadness was expressed over Whitney Houston's death when clearly she had a cocaine problem. Do the people have the same sympathy towards habitual drug users who happen to have less money and so are begging in the streets? Similar for Amy Winehouse - those that said fairly cold things such as "not much of a surprise" got a lot of flak.
 
And, when we compare the above examples, what the people have done in their lives and the situation of their deaths clearly is a factor, e.g. Amy Winehouse made some songs that a lot of people have heard, the drug user and alcoholic unemployed guy on the street did not - so does that justify her life being mourned more than theirs? I think society has said that it does. Whether that is right or wrong isn't for me to say.

I changed my view about drug users/alcohol dependents some years ago when I worked in the field. While there are obviously a percentage of "wasters" who use and abuse, the majority in my experience are trying to cope with or block out other life events/abuse/psychological or sociological problems. The point about Amy Winehouse in comparison is a good one, a rough sleeper on heroin is "scum" or a scrounger whilst Winehouse was "a talent" with problems, both have issues but Joe Public doesn't want to recognise the rough sleeper as having problems or being worthy of grief like a celebrity.
Hands up who had any genuine sympathy for the rough sleeper who got kicked to death in Swansea? And who got more upset about a celebrity they've never met? I guarantee that some forum members will be thinking "what rough sleeper in Swansea?" yet tributes get posted about "celebs".
 
 
Back to Top
SA14 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Wwwww mince

Joined: 15 August 2004
Location: Pemberton
Status: Offline
Points: 25753
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SA14 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 June 2012 at 11:44am
It does get a bit O.T.T. starting threads and getting loads of people reply as if they know the person. Yesterday for instance Victor Spinetti died, no need for pages of posts as if we knew him but in instances like that as with other film stars etc, I think it's more fitting just to remember their films and have a thread about them to bring some light hearted posts in the topic.

Regarding drugs No.6 is pretty spot on. I especially have no time if I know that the person was a 'waster' Look at Pete Docherty, the chances he's been given is disgusting.

I also agree with the Doc on tribute pages on FB being set up. Why contribute to something you have no connection with? My grandfather passed away a few weeks ago, should I have started a FB page? A phone call, a visit or even a text meant much more than that would have. 

If it's a tragic death then people can associate with it a little more, e.g. if a child is murdered or if it's the taking away of an innocent life, especially if it's local.

Regarding Maynard, it would suggest he was drink driving and run away from the police. But because he's a good cricketer will it be OK? What if he had killed a family? Would a normal car thief get as much sympathy?
Back to Top
dr_martinov View Drop Down
Veteran
Veteran
Avatar

Joined: 06 August 2005
Location: Tycoch
Status: Offline
Points: 13608
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dr_martinov Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 June 2012 at 12:18pm
Originally posted by no.6 no.6 wrote:

Originally posted by dr_martinov dr_martinov wrote:

For example, a great deal of sadness was expressed over Whitney Houston's death when clearly she had a cocaine problem. Do the people have the same sympathy towards habitual drug users who happen to have less money and so are begging in the streets? Similar for Amy Winehouse - those that said fairly cold things such as "not much of a surprise" got a lot of flak.
 
And, when we compare the above examples, what the people have done in their lives and the situation of their deaths clearly is a factor, e.g. Amy Winehouse made some songs that a lot of people have heard, the drug user and alcoholic unemployed guy on the street did not - so does that justify her life being mourned more than theirs? I think society has said that it does. Whether that is right or wrong isn't for me to say.

I changed my view about drug users/alcohol dependents some years ago when I worked in the field. While there are obviously a percentage of "wasters" who use and abuse, the majority in my experience are trying to cope with or block out other life events/abuse/psychological or sociological problems. The point about Amy Winehouse in comparison is a good one, a rough sleeper on heroin is "scum" or a scrounger whilst Winehouse was "a talent" with problems, both have issues but Joe Public doesn't want to recognise the rough sleeper as having problems or being worthy of grief like a celebrity.
Hands up who had any genuine sympathy for the rough sleeper who got kicked to death in Swansea? And who got more upset about a celebrity they've never met? I guarantee that some forum members will be thinking "what rough sleeper in Swansea?" yet tributes get posted about "celebs".
 
 

Indeed, and the more right-wing people want to lock them all up as their solution. I think there is an unhealthy obsession with celebrity lifestyles and, presumably as a result of the opinion they somehow contribute more to society, the same rules don't apply either for or towards them as "normies" like ourselves. In addition to acceptable levels of drug use/abuse you can extend this into extra-marital affairs and other inappropriate sleazy behaviour: I believe people are a lot more accepting of this for a celebrity than they would be of a mate or close family member (I would like to think!). As to whether this has always existed and if the internet has made it worse, I'm not sure - it probably is easier for scandal to spread now so I would say it has.

I also found some interesting reactions during the recent riots in London: people suggesting the collapse of society and how kids today have no respect etc., whereby they seemed to be ignorant about history, sometimes even from their own childhoods with the major public disturbances in the 80s and 70s, for example.

People like to moan and gossip are my conclusions from these observations; talking about tragic deaths of people they have no connection with falling into the latter category. 

Although I realised recently that moaners actually do drive significant progress in many ways, for if we all said "ah well, things have been worse, no worries" then governments wouldn't be as pro-active about positive change. You need the constant critics to actually develop society! The irony is that they won't ever recognise the positive impact they've had and simply find something else to moan about!


Edited by dr_martinov - 20 June 2012 at 12:29pm
Back to Top
SA14 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Wwwww mince

Joined: 15 August 2004
Location: Pemberton
Status: Offline
Points: 25753
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SA14 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 June 2012 at 12:30pm
Originally posted by dr_martinov dr_martinov wrote:

Originally posted by no.6 no.6 wrote:

Originally posted by dr_martinov dr_martinov wrote:

For example, a great deal of sadness was expressed over Whitney Houston's death when clearly she had a cocaine problem. Do the people have the same sympathy towards habitual drug users who happen to have less money and so are begging in the streets? Similar for Amy Winehouse - those that said fairly cold things such as "not much of a surprise" got a lot of flak.
 
And, when we compare the above examples, what the people have done in their lives and the situation of their deaths clearly is a factor, e.g. Amy Winehouse made some songs that a lot of people have heard, the drug user and alcoholic unemployed guy on the street did not - so does that justify her life being mourned more than theirs? I think society has said that it does. Whether that is right or wrong isn't for me to say.

I changed my view about drug users/alcohol dependents some years ago when I worked in the field. While there are obviously a percentage of "wasters" who use and abuse, the majority in my experience are trying to cope with or block out other life events/abuse/psychological or sociological problems. The point about Amy Winehouse in comparison is a good one, a rough sleeper on heroin is "scum" or a scrounger whilst Winehouse was "a talent" with problems, both have issues but Joe Public doesn't want to recognise the rough sleeper as having problems or being worthy of grief like a celebrity.
Hands up who had any genuine sympathy for the rough sleeper who got kicked to death in Swansea? And who got more upset about a celebrity they've never met? I guarantee that some forum members will be thinking "what rough sleeper in Swansea?" yet tributes get posted about "celebs".
 
 

Indeed, and the more right-wing people want to lock them all up as their solution. I think there is an unhealthy obsession with celebrity lifestyles and, presumably as a result of the opinion they somehow contribute more to society, the same rules don't apply either for or towards them as "normies" like ourselves. In addition to acceptable levels of drug use/abuse you can extend this into extra-marital affairs and other inappropriate sleazy behaviour: I believe people are a lot more accepting of this for a celebrity than they would be of a mate or close family member (I would like to think!). As to whether this has always existed and if the internet has made it worse, I'm not sure - it probably is easier for scandal to spread now so I would say it has.

I also found some interesting reactions on here during the recent riots in London: people suggesting the collapse of society and how kids today have no respect etc., whereby they seemed to be ignorant about history and their own childhoods with the major public disturbances in the 80s and 70s, for example.

People like to moan and gossip are my conclusions from these observations; talking about tragic deaths of people they have no connection with falling into the latter category. 

I'd suggest they're more violent now and in greater numbers. 

Did anyone here, or know many friends who swore or threatened teachers with violence? Or knew teenagers who were arrogant towards the police when simply asked for their name and address?
Back to Top
KID A View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 16 August 2004
Location: Cardiff
Status: Offline
Points: 28636
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KID A Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 June 2012 at 12:30pm
Originally posted by no.6 no.6 wrote:


Hands up who had any genuine sympathy for the rough sleeper who got kicked to death in Swansea? And who got more upset about a celebrity they've never met? I guarantee that some forum members will be thinking "what rough sleeper in Swansea?" yet tributes get posted about "celebs".
 
 


I don't really see this point though. Tom Maynard was a famous cricketer. His sad deathw as all over mainstream news channels.

Just because people (me included) didn't get to hear about the rough sleeper tragedy in Swansea, it doesn't mean that we wouldn't have felt any sorrow had we heard the news.
Back to Top
LLANDRE View Drop Down
Veteran
Veteran
Avatar

Joined: 31 July 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 17338
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote LLANDRE Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 June 2012 at 12:43pm
I think its helathy that we pay our respects to somone like Tom Maynard and his family. In the instance of Diana and Michael Jackson then i did feel that it was odd that people were crying and they didnt know them.Mass hysteria i think they call it. Im not going to be critical of it as they obviously felt very upset. I suppose it was similar to Grav here at Llanelli. I personally didnt know Grav although i would say a few words to him as Grav spoke to everyone. Im sure many attended Gravs funeral that maybe didnt know him personally but felt like they wanted to pay respects to the person and his family. Ive attended funerals and sometimes ive not known the deceased but have attended the funeral because i knew the deceased wife/husband/daughter/son.
West is Best (Fin gwybod)
Back to Top
KID A View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 16 August 2004
Location: Cardiff
Status: Offline
Points: 28636
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KID A Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 June 2012 at 12:48pm
I remember thinking how bizarre it was that Whitney Houston's funeral was broadacst live on at least 3 different news channels here in the UK.

Back to Top
LLANDRE View Drop Down
Veteran
Veteran
Avatar

Joined: 31 July 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 17338
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote LLANDRE Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 June 2012 at 12:48pm

Every life is precious celebrity or a drunk living in cardboard city. I feel for them all. I suppose celebrities dying attracts attention as people are interested in there lives and know something of there lifestyle etc. and therfore when they die we feel we know them in a very slight way.

The celebrities wouldnt be famous if were not for public adulation therfore its not surprising that they are missed when they are gone.
 
 
West is Best (Fin gwybod)
Back to Top
Once a monkey View Drop Down
Veteran
Veteran
Avatar
Pull !!!

Joined: 30 December 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 15582
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Once a monkey Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 June 2012 at 1:11pm
Originally posted by KID A KID A wrote:

Originally posted by no.6 no.6 wrote:


Hands up who had any genuine sympathy for the rough sleeper who got kicked to death in Swansea? And who got more upset about a celebrity they've never met? I guarantee that some forum members will be thinking "what rough sleeper in Swansea?" yet tributes get posted about "celebs".
 
 


I don't really see this point though. Tom Maynard was a famous cricketer. His sad deathw as all over mainstream news channels.

Just because people (me included) didn't get to hear about the rough sleeper tragedy in Swansea, it doesn't mean that we wouldn't have felt any sorrow had we heard the news.
I think, hope, his point is that the death of the homeless man in Swansea warranted far greater public reaction, debate and indeed outrage. But because he was a homeless man, and we don't like to see such things as a society, it gets ignored. Yet the fact that someone is a celebrity, despite the fact that they may have contributed significantly to their own death or possibly put others at risk, warrants outpourings of sympathy when, in truth, they perhaps deserve less than the homeless man who perhaps never had a fair chance in life and died a horrific death. The latter should prick all our consciences, but generally doesn't.
 
Personally, I'll contribute to certain threads on here if I wish to share a memory of something that person did, or is famous for, i.e. Grav. However, personally I feel no need to express an thoughts on young Maynard as, if I'm truthful, I'm not actually bothered. I feel sympathy for people who lose children but, as posted above, there will have been far greater tradegies yesterday which will have gone unnoticed.
 
I suppose my point is that being a celebrity doesn't actually entitle you to more sympathy/empathy than the next person, so I fail to grasp the need to express condolensces for someone I've never met, who never influenced/inspired me and perhaps who died undue somewhat unusual circumstances. Likewise, I never commented on the Robin Gibb thread, no doubt a great musician, but not my cup of tea.


Edited by Once a monkey - 20 June 2012 at 1:12pm
Back to Top
KID A View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 16 August 2004
Location: Cardiff
Status: Offline
Points: 28636
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KID A Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 June 2012 at 1:16pm
Originally posted by Once a monkey Once a monkey wrote:


I think, hope, his point is that the death of the homeless man in Swansea warranted far greater public reaction, debate and indeed outrage. But because he was a homeless man, and we don't like to see such things as a society, it gets ignored. Yet the fact that someone is a celebrity, despite the fact that they may have contributed significantly to their own death or possibly put others at risk, warrants outpourings of sympathy when, in truth, they perhaps deserve less than the homeless man who perhaps never had a fair chance in life and died a horrific death. The latter should prick all our consciences, but generally doesn't.


I totally agree with all that.

The difference comes when hundreds of people get affected even more : because they saw the bloke play cricket.


Quote I fail to grasp the need to express condolensces for someone I've never met, who never influenced/inspired me and perhaps who died undue somewhat unusual circumstances. Likewise, I never commented on the Robin Gibb thread, no doubt a great musician, but not my cup of tea.


This is key. I don't think I commented on the young co-driver who died (as tragic as it was) recently, as it would have been disinginous of me : as I'd never heard of him.
Back to Top
scarlet96 View Drop Down
Veteran
Veteran
Avatar

Joined: 14 August 2010
Location: Scarlet Land
Status: Offline
Points: 2018
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote scarlet96 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 June 2012 at 1:17pm
Don't mean to cause a stir but some of you are saying Tom wasn't well known but to everyone who followed cricket knew he was a exceptional Talent. Some say he was the best welsh cricketer since his Dad Matthew, some even said he was looking better at 23 than his Dad !! He was destained for England glory very soon and could of been the next KP !! Very very sad loss to the cricket world and everyone who knew him !!
Back to Top
dr_martinov View Drop Down
Veteran
Veteran
Avatar

Joined: 06 August 2005
Location: Tycoch
Status: Offline
Points: 13608
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dr_martinov Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 June 2012 at 1:19pm
Originally posted by scarlet96 scarlet96 wrote:

Don't mean to cause a stir but some of you are saying Tom wasn't well known but to everyone who followed cricket knew he was a exceptional Talent. Some say he was the best welsh cricketer since his Dad Matthew, some even said he was looking better at 23 than his Dad !! He was destained for England glory very soon and could of been the next KP !! Very very sad loss to the cricket world and everyone who knew him !!

This thread isn't about Tom Maynard.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.161 seconds.