The Thing 2011 Remake
Printed From: Scarlet Fever Llanelli Rugby Sport Wales Tickets
Category: SOCIAL
Forum Name: ORDERED
Forum Description: An area for orderly discussion of the arts, science, politics, religion e.t.c.
URL: https://scarletfever.org/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=30869
Printed Date: 27 March 2026 at 3:55am Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: The Thing 2011 Remake
Posted By: mAce
Subject: The Thing 2011 Remake
Date Posted: 26 November 2011 at 8:50pm
Watched it this morning. The original is just too good, I can't think of a remake that beats the original, even when you put nostalgia aside.
|
Replies:
Posted By: A Evans
Date Posted: 26 November 2011 at 8:58pm
Heat was better than L.A. Takedown?
------------- We are Con Air. You will be assimilated. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Resistance is futile.
|
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 27 November 2011 at 4:09pm
A Evans wrote:
Heat was better than L.A. Takedown?
|
over rated in my opinion
|
Posted By: dr_martinov
Date Posted: 27 November 2011 at 4:26pm
|
I thought the remake of Dawn of the Dead was amazing at the time.
|
Posted By: KID A
Date Posted: 27 November 2011 at 4:59pm
mAce wrote:
I can't think of a remake that beats the original, even when you put nostalgia aside.
|
Casino Royale?
|
Posted By: SA14
Date Posted: 27 November 2011 at 5:07pm
|
I suppose it depends which you see first.
|
Posted By: lofty evans
Date Posted: 27 November 2011 at 9:05pm
The original Thing film was ground breaking and superb.
------------- In 1972, Roy Bergiers scored that try and said "that was for you lofty"
"All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us"
|
Posted By: Sam Cheese
Date Posted: 27 November 2011 at 11:13pm
It's a prequel, isn't it? Not a remake?
------------- You will know the vengeance of the Lord Humungus! I promise you... nobody... nobody... gets out of here alive!
|
Posted By: dr_martinov
Date Posted: 29 November 2011 at 10:17pm
|
And (I've just found out) The Thing (1982) is actually a remake of The Thing from Another World (1951) anyway!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_from_Another_World - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_from_Another_World
|
Posted By: Sam Cheese
Date Posted: 30 November 2011 at 10:29am
Incorrect Dr M.
As SFevers preeminent sci-fi pedant, I think you'll find "The Thing" is not a remake of "Thing From Another World". Both are films based on a short story called "Who Goes There" by John W Campbell.
------------- You will know the vengeance of the Lord Humungus! I promise you... nobody... nobody... gets out of here alive!
|
Posted By: Keithd
Date Posted: 30 November 2011 at 11:12am
|
I hope they don't ever try and do a remake of Zulu. It's a classic film and stand's the test of time.
|
Posted By: dr_martinov
Date Posted: 30 November 2011 at 11:49am
Sam Cheese wrote:
Incorrect Dr M.
As SFevers preeminent sci-fi pedant, I think you'll find "The Thing" is not a remake of "Thing From Another World". Both are films based on a short story called "Who Goes There" by John W Campbell. |
Point taken (I'll read Wikipedia more carefully next time  ). Even so, it means "The Thing (1982)" is the second film to be based upon the same story and to be known by the same title - the same criteria that have been applied within this thread to dub the most recent film a "remake".
Nomenclature aside, I think SA14 said it best - it often depends on what film you've seen first. If you watch a remake (or the original after the remake) then you will always be comparing it to the other. I watched the more recent Dawn of the Dead first, for example, and didn't think the original was that good. I can completely understand people with the opposite viewing order having a different opinion.
|
Posted By: Sam Cheese
Date Posted: 30 November 2011 at 12:37pm
dr_martinov wrote:
Sam Cheese wrote:
Incorrect Dr M.
As SFevers preeminent sci-fi pedant, I think you'll find "The Thing" is not a remake of "Thing From Another World". Both are films based on a short story called "Who Goes There" by John W Campbell. |
<div style="text-align: left; : rgb251, 251, 253; ">Point taken (I'll read Wikipedia more carefully next time  ). Even so, it means "The Thing (1982)" is the second film to be based upon the same story and to be known by the same title - the same criteria that have been applied within this thread to dub the most recent film a "remake". <div style="text-align: left; : rgb251, 251, 253; ">
Nomenclature aside, I think SA14 said it best - it often depends on what film you've seen first. If you watch a remake (or the original after the remake) then you will always be comparing it to the other. I watched the more recent Dawn of the Dead first, for example, and didn't think the original was that good. I can completely understand people with the opposite viewing order having a different opinion. |
Sadly, I didn't need to read Wikipedia to know about "Who Goes There". The useless sci-fi fact was already in my brain.
God help me.
------------- You will know the vengeance of the Lord Humungus! I promise you... nobody... nobody... gets out of here alive!
|
Posted By: SMELLYMIKE
Date Posted: 30 November 2011 at 12:55pm
Some one should make a film of the 1966 nebulae awards story, behold the man....... That would cause a bit of uproar
------------- I am only responsible for what I say. Not for what you understand
|
Posted By: mAce
Date Posted: 30 November 2011 at 12:58pm
SMELLYMIKE wrote:
Some one should make a film of the 1966 nebulae awards story, behold the man....... That would cause a bit of uproar |
Behold the man was 1967...
|
Posted By: lofty evans
Date Posted: 30 November 2011 at 1:15pm
mAce wrote:
SMELLYMIKE wrote:
Some one should make a film of the 1966 nebulae awards story, behold the man....... That would cause a bit of uproar |
Behold the man was 1967... |
------------- In 1972, Roy Bergiers scored that try and said "that was for you lofty"
"All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us"
|
Posted By: dr_martinov
Date Posted: 30 November 2011 at 2:12pm
Sam Cheese wrote:
dr_martinov wrote:
Sam Cheese wrote:
Incorrect Dr M.
As SFevers preeminent sci-fi pedant, I think you'll find "The Thing" is not a remake of "Thing From Another World". Both are films based on a short story called "Who Goes There" by John W Campbell. |
<div style="text-align: left; : rgb251, 251, 253; ">Point taken (I'll read Wikipedia more carefully next time  ). Even so, it means "The Thing (1982)" is the second film to be based upon the same story and to be known by the same title - the same criteria that have been applied within this thread to dub the most recent film a "remake". <div style="text-align: left; : rgb251, 251, 253; ">
Nomenclature aside, I think SA14 said it best - it often depends on what film you've seen first. If you watch a remake (or the original after the remake) then you will always be comparing it to the other. I watched the more recent Dawn of the Dead first, for example, and didn't think the original was that good. I can completely understand people with the opposite viewing order having a different opinion. |
Sadly, I didn't need to read Wikipedia to know about "Who Goes There". The useless sci-fi fact was already in my brain.
God help me. |
It's good knowledge. Be a useful addition to any pub quiz team.  Dunno what my speciality would be... Red Dwarf and science, probably.
|
Posted By: Mrfwon
Date Posted: 30 November 2011 at 2:31pm
|