When a tackle becomes a ruck
Printed From: Scarlet Fever Llanelli Rugby Sport Wales Tickets
Category: RUGBY
Forum Name: ARE YOU BLIND REF.... OR ARE WE WRONG ???
Forum Description: Refereeing points of law questions and answers
URL: https://scarletfever.org/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=33636
Printed Date: 27 March 2026 at 3:52am Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: When a tackle becomes a ruck
Posted By: KID A
Subject: When a tackle becomes a ruck
Date Posted: 03 June 2012 at 3:43pm
When a tackle becomes a ruck, we often see the tackled player keep pushing the ball back to try and get it to the scrum half.
Why is this allowed? Surely once there are 3 players involved all playing of the ball has to stop?
|
Replies:
Posted By: scarletman
Date Posted: 03 June 2012 at 4:30pm
Two players on their feet (one from each side) contesting the ball on the floor, is a ruck ... The players off their feet are NOT part of the Ruck, but are part of a "pile up" ....
Once "RUCK" is called, no player should use his hands, so you are correct. At the highest level, the general concensus is that if the Ruck hasn't been turned over in the first two seconds, it is "Ball Lost"... a phrase you'll hear Nigel Owens use frequently, then the defending side will re-set to defend the next phase ...
As you decend through the levels of Rugby, that two seconds gets considerably longer, & "pile ups" are a mopre frequent occurrance.
Once the counter ruck is no longer an option & the defence re-sets, referees will allow the tackled player to assist the ball to exit the ruck quickly to aid the game to flow... However, if the hand pushing the ball back, belongs to ANY other player, then a penalty should be awarded !
------------- Herman Tours ... Still the best way to travel !
|
Posted By: SMELLYMIKE
Date Posted: 03 June 2012 at 7:32pm
Your just making this load of Bollox up...just to validate your expenses....Refs are far worse than Bankers ..but both cant be trusted
------------- I am only responsible for what I say. Not for what you understand
|
Posted By: scarletman
Date Posted: 03 June 2012 at 7:59pm
|
& to think I fought for your re-instatement Mike !
------------- Herman Tours ... Still the best way to travel !
|
Posted By: SMELLYMIKE
Date Posted: 03 June 2012 at 8:01pm
scarletman wrote:
& to think I fought for your re-instatement Mike !
| Big hug ..its not forgottrn
------------- I am only responsible for what I say. Not for what you understand
|
Posted By: Once a monkey
Date Posted: 05 June 2012 at 12:32am
|
Confusion comes at ruck time because people who have joined the ruck often go off their feet in an attempt to clear off defending players, which is why players like Tuperic do so well. In fact, he is a ter. Ruck is often formed but he doesn't allow the first man from the attacking team to take him off his feet. People pile in, but he is often the only man on his feet, the reason why he has so many turnovers.
|
Posted By: scarletman
Date Posted: 05 June 2012 at 10:54am
But don't forget the main aim of the Referee (well in my case anyway) is to keep the game flowing ... i.e. if it doesn't have a material effect on the game, don't ping it ! It makes for a better spectator sport all round !
------------- Herman Tours ... Still the best way to travel !
|
Posted By: KID A
Date Posted: 05 June 2012 at 11:20am
scarletman wrote:
But don't forget the main aim of the Referee (well in my case anyway) is to keep the game flowing ... i.e. if it doesn't have a material effect on the game, don't ping it ! It makes for a better spectator sport all round !
|
I think that's what gets the fans so frustrated. The whole stand can see an offence that has previously been pinged, yet the referee decides to leave it go in the name of good rugby. Not fair on the team that has been infringed against.
That's the referee taking the law into his own hands in my opinion.
|
Posted By: KID A
Date Posted: 16 June 2012 at 9:53am
scarletman wrote:
Two players on their feet (one from each side) contesting the ball on the floor, is a ruck ... The players off their feet are NOT part of the Ruck, but are part of a "pile up" ....
Once "RUCK" is called, no player should use his hands, so you are correct. At the highest level, the general concensus is that if the Ruck hasn't been turned over in the first two seconds, it is "Ball Lost"... a phrase you'll hear Nigel Owens use frequently, then the defending side will re-set to defend the next phase ...
As you decend through the levels of Rugby, that two seconds gets considerably longer, & "pile ups" are a mopre frequent occurrance.
Once the counter ruck is no longer an option & the defence re-sets, referees will allow the tackled player to assist the ball to exit the ruck quickly to aid the game to flow... However, if the hand pushing the ball back, belongs to ANY other player, then a penalty should be awarded !
|
NZ V IRE. Attacking ball player using hands to put the ball back after 1 second, 2 seconds, 3 seconds, 4 seconds before and after the defence has reset.
It's a nonsense really.
I understand the game has to flow and attacking side should get benefit of doubt, but the law is being exploited.
|
Posted By: aber-fan
Date Posted: 17 June 2012 at 8:36pm
I don't have a problem with this. It does not prevent a legal 'jackal' by the tackling team, if their second man there (or presumably the tackler if he's released the tackled player and got back to his feet) from leaning over and grabbing the ball, in which case the guy on the floor will be penalised unless he gives up the ball.
If the defenders aren't quick enough to do this before the attackers claim the ball, then tough IMO.
------------- “You cannot reason a man out of what he never reasoned himself into.” (Jonathan Swift)
|
|