Print Page | Close Window

20 mph speed limits from 18 September 2023

Printed From: Scarlet Fever Llanelli Rugby Sport Wales Tickets
Category: RUGBY
Forum Name: AWAY FANS INFORMATION ZONE
Forum Description: Local information for opposition supporters
URL: https://scarletfever.org/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=47454
Printed Date: 22 September 2023 at 5:02am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: 20 mph speed limits from 18 September 2023
Posted By: Eastern outpost
Subject: 20 mph speed limits from 18 September 2023
Date Posted: 17 September 2023 at 10:41am
How is the journey to y Parc affected by the new limits? Are the main routes unaffected and it’s the side streets?

-------------
In a world where you can be anything – Be Kind.



Replies:
Posted By: roy munster
Date Posted: 17 September 2023 at 3:52pm
This is the kind of idea that in theory shoud help reduce accidents but in reaity it may make things worse

Around scarlets its 40mph to the lights at pemberton then turn right or left and its immediately down to 20 ..........Bryn bynea llwynhendy al 20mph I think dafen foel stradey areas not clearly marked its confusing

The welsh governments own report says it will damage the welsh economy by over £4.5 billion
I drove around town a lot last few days and it is chaos and confusion
unmarked speed limits some roads are 20 then 40 then 20 in the space of a few yards
theres already speed bumps and pot holes an wider pavements everywhere damaging cars. How is that making anyone safer? Surey the fact theyve abandoned road improvements and relief roads, pus the endless stop starting with speed bumps pot hotes and now the confusion over the 20mph zones create this congestion will increase pollution too?

The feedback Ive had from talking to 100s of people is theyre all 100% against 20mph roads everywhere except all schools and hospitals. Everyone is scared and confused 1000s of decent drivers will lose their licenses and jobs. everyone thinks it is a cash cow for poiticians police and councils to squeeze more money out of working people. 

Its been implemented terribly.........I hope it actualy does save lives as the politicians claim but is there evidence of that? Tragically it may even cost more lives as confused drivers wil slam on their brakes and get rear ended. The least they MUST do is make it all much much clearer.

Amazon and other companies have aready said theyl increase charges to west wales
time for deliveries of medica supplies, food, emergencies such as taking people to hospital as ambuances are unavailable m late for school, congestion more pollution, late for appointments work way less productivity

Lets hope the police are as vigilant in catching and imprisoning car thieves and those with no licenses as I know from painful experience when I had a car stolen few yrs ago the police did absolutely nothing despite a ton of evidence including camera footage inside the car, finger prints, tracker reports, umpteen eye witnesses etc etc 
 


-------------
ROYMOND MUNTER MBE (FOR SERVICES TO THE COMBOVER)


Posted By: ladram
Date Posted: 17 September 2023 at 4:02pm
Everything in Wales is broken under labour in Wales and it's getting worse and i detest the Tories  the whole country is broken



Posted By: roy munster
Date Posted: 17 September 2023 at 6:51pm
Originally posted by ladram ladram wrote:

Everything in Wales is broken under labour in Wales and it's getting worse and i detest the Tories  the whole country is broken


hard to disagree with that
both parties are shameful 


-------------
ROYMOND MUNTER MBE (FOR SERVICES TO THE COMBOVER)


Posted By: Winston
Date Posted: 17 September 2023 at 7:22pm
Wasn’t a good journey from Ross to PYS with the usual Newport snarl up on the M4. But the M4 closed for roadworks on the way back so detoured Merthyr and Abergavenny.   Absolute nightmare.  Can you believe the main artery road closed during the daytime. Don’t they work overnight in Wales 


Posted By: reesytheexile
Date Posted: 17 September 2023 at 9:20pm
It’s hard to keep to 20 mph isn’t it but I guess that if it ends up saving lives - perhaps even a family member or friend- I will be happy. We just need to give it a go.It’s being reviewed in a year isn’t it? Also councils can apply for changes and exceptions if changes are needed and hope they do this when sensible to do so. It’s not the end of the world tbf. 


Posted By: aber-fan
Date Posted: 18 September 2023 at 8:37am
Some points about this new 20mph limit in town centres - which I favour:

1. It is not a blanket 20mph - councils can vary it and have a higher limit in places they think it makes sense. I daresay it will take time for those variations to be implemented in a tidy way, but the problem is not insurmountable.

2. Will it save lives? Yes - I have seen A&E surgeons say so - and especially of children who are more likely to be killed as pedestrians, since they are shorter and their vital organs are more likely to get hit by cars.

3. Will it cut pollution? Yes.

4. To the personal example regarding safety - there is a long, steep hill leading into Aberystwyth from the north - Penglais hill. Just before the town starts, there is a 40mph limit which is already a bit generous IMO, since just after a bend you get a crossroads at the top of the hill with commuters joining from the minor road on the right, and more form the left... plus, many parents are turning right across the road to deliver their kids to Penglais school in the morning. 

Further down, another major junction with the university campus on the left - but with commuting students and staff coming up the hill and turning right across the road.

At around the point where 40mph becomes 30mph, another double junction on the left - the second is more important as it is for the national Library of Wales, and staff must turn right across the traffic to get to work if coming out from town.

Just after the 30 mph limit starts - the hospital car park on the left, so cars from town must again turn right across the flow; there is an exit from the car park another 20m further on, and another road into my part of town another 20m after that! Doing a right turn here is really stressful, as many drivers DO NOT stick to even 30mph but are doing much more... and some/many idiots who have a bit of a gap in front, instead of allowing a turn to be made actually accelerate to close any gaps! After all that pointless speed, the traffic slows to a crawl as the jam backs up from Coopers corner... so nothing gained. 

This is why driving too fast in town is so annoying - not only is it dangerous, but it doesn't gain any significant amount of time.

As for the centre - you'd be lucky to do 20mph there most of the day. It's not possible.


-------------
“You cannot reason a man out of what he never reasoned himself into.” (Jonathan Swift)


Posted By: Fscarlet
Date Posted: 18 September 2023 at 8:41am
Hopped in the car this morning & there were many people driving at 30 then realising they should be doing 20! 

Will take some getting used to as lots of people drive round Milford at more than 30.


Posted By: roy munster
Date Posted: 18 September 2023 at 2:36pm
Originally posted by aber-fan aber-fan wrote:

Some points about this new 20mph limit in town centres - which I favour:

1. It is not a blanket 20mph - councils can vary it and have a higher limit in places they think it makes sense. I daresay it will take time for those variations to be implemented in a tidy way, but the problem is not insurmountable.

2. Will it save lives? Yes - I have seen A&E surgeons say so - and especially of children who are more likely to be killed as pedestrians, since they are shorter and their vital organs are more likely to get hit by cars.

3. Will it cut pollution? Yes.

4. To the personal example regarding safety - there is a long, steep hill leading into Aberystwyth from the north - Penglais hill. Just before the town starts, there is a 40mph limit which is already a bit generous IMO, since just after a bend you get a crossroads at the top of the hill with commuters joining from the minor road on the right, and more form the left... plus, many parents are turning right across the road to deliver their kids to Penglais school in the morning. 

Further down, another major junction with the university campus on the left - but with commuting students and staff coming up the hill and turning right across the road.

At around the point where 40mph becomes 30mph, another double junction on the left - the second is more important as it is for the national Library of Wales, and staff must turn right across the traffic to get to work if coming out from town.

Just after the 30 mph limit starts - the hospital car park on the left, so cars from town must again turn right across the flow; there is an exit from the car park another 20m further on, and another road into my part of town another 20m after that! Doing a right turn here is really stressful, as many drivers DO NOT stick to even 30mph but are doing much more... and some/many idiots who have a bit of a gap in front, instead of allowing a turn to be made actually accelerate to close any gaps! After all that pointless speed, the traffic slows to a crawl as the jam backs up from Coopers corner... so nothing gained. 

This is why driving too fast in town is so annoying - not only is it dangerous, but it doesn't gain any significant amount of time.

As for the centre - you'd be lucky to do 20mph there most of the day. It's not possible.

Speed bumps pot holes 20 mph congestion m scrapping road improvements and relief roads and endless changes of speed often on the time strip of road will combined increase polution. Not just exhaust fumes but tyre polution from the endless stop start

Surey most intelligent countries target the dangerous roads and thats where they put 20 mph zones



-------------
ROYMOND MUNTER MBE (FOR SERVICES TO THE COMBOVER)


Posted By: RR1972
Date Posted: 18 September 2023 at 6:57pm
Originally posted by aber-fan aber-fan wrote:

Some points about this new 20mph limit in town centres - which I favour:

1. It is not a blanket 20mph - councils can vary it and have a higher limit in places they think it makes sense. I daresay it will take time for those variations to be implemented in a tidy way, but the problem is not insurmountable.

2. Will it save lives? Yes - I have seen A&E surgeons say so - and especially of children who are more likely to be killed as pedestrians, since they are shorter and their vital organs are more likely to get hit by cars.

3. Will it cut pollution? Yes.

4. To the personal example regarding safety - there is a long, steep hill leading into Aberystwyth from the north - Penglais hill. Just before the town starts, there is a 40mph limit which is already a bit generous IMO, since just after a bend you get a crossroads at the top of the hill with commuters joining from the minor road on the right, and more form the left... plus, many parents are turning right across the road to deliver their kids to Penglais school in the morning. 

Further down, another major junction with the university campus on the left - but with commuting students and staff coming up the hill and turning right across the road.

At around the point where 40mph becomes 30mph, another double junction on the left - the second is more important as it is for the national Library of Wales, and staff must turn right across the traffic to get to work if coming out from town.

Just after the 30 mph limit starts - the hospital car park on the left, so cars from town must again turn right across the flow; there is an exit from the car park another 20m further on, and another road into my part of town another 20m after that! Doing a right turn here is really stressful, as many drivers DO NOT stick to even 30mph but are doing much more... and some/many idiots who have a bit of a gap in front, instead of allowing a turn to be made actually accelerate to close any gaps! After all that pointless speed, the traffic slows to a crawl as the jam backs up from Coopers corner... so nothing gained. 

This is why driving too fast in town is so annoying - not only is it dangerous, but it doesn't gain any significant amount of time.

As for the centre - you'd be lucky to do 20mph there most of the day. It's not possible.
how will loads of vehcles being stuck in endless traffic jams cut pollution? It’s a load of hot air (pardon the pun)


Posted By: RR1972
Date Posted: 18 September 2023 at 7:05pm
The 20 mph hr around schools is fine but otherwuse ir’s just daft. Same as this race to go to all electric cars. Wales contrubutes leds than 0.5 per cent of global green house gasses, if we all stopped driving in wales it would make no difference what so ever to global warning and drakeford and co shold be honest pn this and say so. 


Posted By: SA14
Date Posted: 18 September 2023 at 9:16pm
Originally posted by RR1972 RR1972 wrote:

Originally posted by aber-fan aber-fan wrote:

Some points about this new 20mph limit in town centres - which I favour:

1. It is not a blanket 20mph - councils can vary it and have a higher limit in places they think it makes sense. I daresay it will take time for those variations to be implemented in a tidy way, but the problem is not insurmountable.

2. Will it save lives? Yes - I have seen A&E surgeons say so - and especially of children who are more likely to be killed as pedestrians, since they are shorter and their vital organs are more likely to get hit by cars.

3. Will it cut pollution? Yes.

4. To the personal example regarding safety - there is a long, steep hill leading into Aberystwyth from the north - Penglais hill. Just before the town starts, there is a 40mph limit which is already a bit generous IMO, since just after a bend you get a crossroads at the top of the hill with commuters joining from the minor road on the right, and more form the left... plus, many parents are turning right across the road to deliver their kids to Penglais school in the morning. 

Further down, another major junction with the university campus on the left - but with commuting students and staff coming up the hill and turning right across the road.

At around the point where 40mph becomes 30mph, another double junction on the left - the second is more important as it is for the national Library of Wales, and staff must turn right across the traffic to get to work if coming out from town.

Just after the 30 mph limit starts - the hospital car park on the left, so cars from town must again turn right across the flow; there is an exit from the car park another 20m further on, and another road into my part of town another 20m after that! Doing a right turn here is really stressful, as many drivers DO NOT stick to even 30mph but are doing much more... and some/many idiots who have a bit of a gap in front, instead of allowing a turn to be made actually accelerate to close any gaps! After all that pointless speed, the traffic slows to a crawl as the jam backs up from Coopers corner... so nothing gained. 

This is why driving too fast in town is so annoying - not only is it dangerous, but it doesn't gain any significant amount of time.

As for the centre - you'd be lucky to do 20mph there most of the day. It's not possible.
how will loads of vehcles being stuck in endless traffic jams cut pollution? It’s a load of hot air (pardon the pun)

Newer cars cut out plus there’ll be more electric cars. It’ll all level out in the end. 


Posted By: Raised By Peregos
Date Posted: 19 September 2023 at 11:11am
As for the centre - you'd be lucky to do 20mph there most of the day. It's not possible.
[/QUOTE]

Speed bumps pot holes 20 mph congestion m scrapping road improvements and relief roads and endless changes of speed often on the time strip of road will combined increase polution. Not just exhaust fumes but tyre polution from the endless stop start

Surey most intelligent countries target the dangerous roads and thats where they put 20 mph zones

[/QUOTE]

They have targeted the most dangerous roads. Statistically the 30mph zones are by far the worst. 


 

The point about electric cars is valid. It IS hard to drive consistently at 20mph but it will be less so in electric and future vehicles... and all petrol and diesel are being phased out anyway. 


Posted By: roy munster
Date Posted: 19 September 2023 at 11:20am
Originally posted by Raised By Peregos Raised By Peregos wrote:

As for the centre - you'd be lucky to do 20mph there most of the day. It's not possible.

Speed bumps pot holes 20 mph congestion m scrapping road improvements and relief roads and endless changes of speed often on the time strip of road will combined increase polution. Not just exhaust fumes but tyre polution from the endless stop start

Surey most intelligent countries target the dangerous roads and thats where they put 20 mph zones

[/QUOTE]

They have targeted the most dangerous roads. Statistically the 30mph zones are by far the worst. 


 

The point about electric cars is valid. It IS hard to drive consistently at 20mph but it will be less so in electric and future vehicles... and all petrol and diesel are being phased out anyway. 
[/QUOTE]

It's not it's pretty much all roads in built up areas
The whole world going electric is a fantasy , not only are they way less reliable far more expensive , thousands of charging ports , you have lithium wars lithium mines lithium burials 
The carbon footprint is way underestimated too
Millions using the grid will lead to power cuts
This Draconian one size fits all no flexibility will lead to calamity
The roads will be strewn with broken down cars too
Hybrid cars were never given enough chance their footprint isn't much more and they're reliable and avoid all of these problems too


-------------
ROYMOND MUNTER MBE (FOR SERVICES TO THE COMBOVER)


Posted By: RR1972
Date Posted: 19 September 2023 at 11:21am
Out of curio how do 40 mph  roafs compare to 30 mph injury wise? ? If they are lower Maybe we should increase not reduce soeed! There are a lot more (well there were a lot more) 30 mph roads than 20 mph roads than 30 mph so it stands to reason there will be more fatalities on these roads. I dare say there are less pedestrians killed and injured on motor ways then there are on 20 mph and 30 mph roads? See how easy it is to bend  stats to your view point


Posted By: reesytheexile
Date Posted: 19 September 2023 at 11:23am
I have just discovered ( page 120 or whatever of my manual) that our 3 year old Skoda Kamiq has a speed limiter ! I had no idea and suspect many cars up to say 5-6 years old are the same. Dare I try it fiddle with it but is there any point as these 20 mph zones don’t last long? 🤔


Posted By: Raised By Peregos
Date Posted: 19 September 2023 at 11:28am
Originally posted by RR1972 RR1972 wrote:

Out of curio how do 40 moh roafs compare to 30 mph injury wise? ? If they are lower Maybe we should increase not reduce soeec


They are not. See table. 


Posted By: RR1972
Date Posted: 19 September 2023 at 11:45am
Originally posted by Raised By Peregos Raised By Peregos wrote:

Originally posted by RR1972 RR1972 wrote:

Out of curio how do 40 moh roafs compare to 30 mph injury wise? ? If they are lower Maybe we should increase not reduce soeec


They are not. See table. 
so now many 20 mph roads were compared to 30 mpg when that table was completed? If a lot less then it’s hardly a shock there are lot less injuries? It’s just a numbers thing really


Posted By: Raised By Peregos
Date Posted: 19 September 2023 at 12:17pm
"It's not it's pretty much all roads in built up areas" - Roy

Yes, of course it's built-up areas... that's the point. They are the dangerous roads for pedestrians, which this is predominantly aimed at protecting. Roads that don't really have pedestrians will be exempt. The limit is mostly to reduce pedestrian casualties... for you and RR, I don't know how you can look at those statistics and NOT see the amount of pedestrians hurt or killed on 30mph speed limit roads is VASTLY higher than any others.

I'm not raving about this change either, but the data does show that when you reduce speeds you reduce the impact of collisions and therefore reduce the most negative outcomes and it provide greater time for motorists to see pedestrians, and pedestrians to see motorists. 



Posted By: RR1972
Date Posted: 19 September 2023 at 1:05pm
Originally posted by Raised By Peregos Raised By Peregos wrote:

"It's not it's pretty much all roads in built up areas" - Roy

Yes, of course it's built-up areas... that's the point. They are the dangerous roads for pedestrians, which this is predominantly aimed at protecting. Roads that don't really have pedestrians will be exempt. The limit is mostly to reduce pedestrian casualties... for you and RR, I don't know how you can look at those statistics and NOT see the amount of pedestrians hurt or killed on 30mph speed limit roads is VASTLY higher than any others.

I'm not raving about this change either, but the data does show that when you reduce speeds you reduce the impact of collisions and therefore reduce the most negative outcomes and it provide greater time for motorists to see pedestrians, and pedestrians to see motorists. 

ok ill bet you any money now we see more 20 mph roads we see more injuries and fatalties in 20 mph zones, the current stats are skewed due to the numbers . The reason more people are currently injured in 30 mph zones is becuse there a lot more 30 mph zones. Let’s see these stats in a years time


Posted By: roy munster
Date Posted: 19 September 2023 at 1:38pm
No one asked for this

Its such a mess out there people slamming on brakes confused as to whether its 20 or 30 mph guaranteed to create more accidents
The so called poll drakeford did of 1000 people must have been skewed or biased as 99% of people Ive spoken to think this is comlete and utter madness and yet another cash cow for the WAG to squeeze out of struggling workers

This added to the insane WAG landlord laws is yet another nail in the coffin after brexit, covid, cost of living crisis are they out to destroy the working people?

Little wonder were one of the poorest countries in europe no doubt climbing to the top soon


-------------
ROYMOND MUNTER MBE (FOR SERVICES TO THE COMBOVER)


Posted By: Raised By Peregos
Date Posted: 19 September 2023 at 2:51pm

[/QUOTE] ok ill bet you any money now we see more 20 mph roads we see more injuries and fatalties in 20 mph zones, the current stats are skewed due to the numbers . The reason more people are currently injured in 30 mph zones is becuse there a lot more 30 mph zones. Let’s see these stats in a years time [/QUOTE]

Of course it will! That's a stupid bet to take. No-one's arguing that it won't change THOSE particular stats on THAT graph. 

But what it WILL change is that a car travelling at 20mph will kill and injure less people than a car travelling at 30mph! And because a large percentage of roads will change (35% I believe?) to 20mph that will reduce total casualties overall.




Posted By: Raised By Peregos
Date Posted: 19 September 2023 at 3:01pm
Originally posted by roy munster roy munster wrote:

No one asked for this

Its such a mess out there people slamming on brakes confused as to whether its 20 or 30 mph guaranteed to create more accidents
The so called poll drakeford did of 1000 people must have been skewed or biased as 99% of people Ive spoken to think this is comlete and utter madness and yet another cash cow for the WAG to squeeze out of struggling workers

This added to the insane WAG landlord laws is yet another nail in the coffin after brexit, covid, cost of living crisis are they out to destroy the working people?

Little wonder were one of the poorest countries in europe no doubt climbing to the top soon

I'm sure a lot of people asked for this. The people on that table for a start!

Respectfully, if you have a problem with the legitimate research of a 1000 people, I have a problem with you canvassing your mates' opinions.

 (all of the research (full reports), along with a shed load of other documents pertaining to this change, can be found extremely easily on the Welsh gov site btw).

Also, it's a default speed limit. They'll be signs saying if you can go 30mph. I'm sure people will figure that out. 


Posted By: greypower1
Date Posted: 19 September 2023 at 3:07pm
Electric cars are 20% heavier than equivalent petrol/diesel cars so if they are involved in a collision they will cause more serious injuries to humans.
Maybe a case to ban them from 20 mph zones.Wink


-------------
Keep the faith


Posted By: RR1972
Date Posted: 19 September 2023 at 3:07pm
Originally posted by Raised By Peregos Raised By Peregos wrote:


ok ill bet you any money now we see more 20 mph roads we see more injuries and fatalties in 20 mph zones, the current stats are skewed due to the numbers . The reason more people are currently injured in 30 mph zones is becuse there a lot more 30 mph zones. Let’s see these stats in a years time [/QUOTE]

Of course it will! That's a stupid bet to take. No-one's arguing that it won't change THOSE particular stats on THAT graph. 

But what it WILL change is that a car travelling at 20mph will kill and injure less people than a car travelling at 30mph! And because a large percentage of roads will change (35% I believe?) to 20mph that will reduce total casualties overall.


[/QUOTE] up untill this rule next to no cars were travelling at 20 mph lets see how those stats carry on. Ill wager we have no less deaths in the next calendar year. Most fatalties are not caused by pepple going 30 mph but  people speeding and going well over the linit.  Often these folk are uninsured over the linit on drink or drugs if you think this new rule will stop them your very much mistaken


Posted By: roy munster
Date Posted: 19 September 2023 at 4:57pm
Originally posted by Raised By Peregos Raised By Peregos wrote:

Originally posted by roy munster roy munster wrote:

No one asked for this

Its such a mess out there people slamming on brakes confused as to whether its 20 or 30 mph guaranteed to create more accidents
The so called poll drakeford did of 1000 people must have been skewed or biased as 99% of people Ive spoken to think this is comlete and utter madness and yet another cash cow for the WAG to squeeze out of struggling workers

This added to the insane WAG landlord laws is yet another nail in the coffin after brexit, covid, cost of living crisis are they out to destroy the working people?

Little wonder were one of the poorest countries in europe no doubt climbing to the top soon

I'm sure a lot of people asked for this. The people on that table for a start!

Respectfully, if you have a problem with the legitimate research of a 1000 people, I have a problem with you canvassing your mates' opinions.

 (all of the research (full reports), along with a shed load of other documents pertaining to this change, can be found extremely easily on the Welsh gov site btw).

Also, it's a default speed limit. They'll be signs saying if you can go 30mph. I'm sure people will figure that out. 

Nonsense
The signs are a mess loads of roads which are meant to be 20 are sign posted 30 
Online polls show 87% are against it and 130,000 have signed a petition to scrap this cash cow
https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/politics/welsh-government-no-plans-revisit-27740942" rel="nofollow - https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/politics/welsh-government-no-plans-revisit-27740942

Meanwhile if the oliticians are that concenred with road safety why dont they fix the pot holes and reduce the speed bumps which damage cars and make cars more dangerous?
It will obviously pollute much more too the endless stop start the endless speed bumps always in the lower gears and the massive tyre pollution from endless stop start
This is lunacy

The trouble with this one size fits all radical draconian ruling is it shows no flexibility for all the variables .....deliveries of criticial sulies whether it be medical , machinery, food etc massively damaging the economy , people late for hospital appointments , operations, workm school, ambulances late etc

Lest we forget its nigh on impossible to get an ambulance now so people are driving emergency patients to hospital but only at 20mph where every second counts that too will cost lives


-------------
ROYMOND MUNTER MBE (FOR SERVICES TO THE COMBOVER)


Posted By: roy munster
Date Posted: 19 September 2023 at 5:20pm
Originally posted by RR1972 RR1972 wrote:

Originally posted by Raised By Peregos Raised By Peregos wrote:


ok ill bet you any money now we see more 20 mph roads we see more injuries and fatalties in 20 mph zones, the current stats are skewed due to the numbers . The reason more people are currently injured in 30 mph zones is becuse there a lot more 30 mph zones. Let’s see these stats in a years time

Of course it will! That's a stupid bet to take. No-one's arguing that it won't change THOSE particular stats on THAT graph. 

But what it WILL change is that a car travelling at 20mph will kill and injure less people than a car travelling at 30mph! And because a large percentage of roads will change (35% I believe?) to 20mph that will reduce total casualties overall.


[/QUOTE] up untill this rule next to no cars were travelling at 20 mph lets see how those stats carry on. Ill wager we have no less deaths in the next calendar year. Most fatalties are not caused by pepple going 30 mph but  people speeding and going well over the linit.  Often these folk are uninsured over the linit on drink or drugs if you think this new rule will stop them your very much mistaken[/QUOTE]

I know for a fact the police for whatever reason often do not prosecute uninsured car thieves / drinkers etc As I stated previously 2 cars stolen a few years ago, the police were given everything they could possibly need cctv footage, tracker reports, umpteen witnessesm even the finger prints matched and the man walked free?


-------------
ROYMOND MUNTER MBE (FOR SERVICES TO THE COMBOVER)


Posted By: SA14
Date Posted: 19 September 2023 at 9:38pm
Originally posted by RR1972 RR1972 wrote:

Originally posted by Raised By Peregos Raised By Peregos wrote:

"It's not it's pretty much all roads in built up areas" - Roy

Yes, of course it's built-up areas... that's the point. They are the dangerous roads for pedestrians, which this is predominantly aimed at protecting. Roads that don't really have pedestrians will be exempt. The limit is mostly to reduce pedestrian casualties... for you and RR, I don't know how you can look at those statistics and NOT see the amount of pedestrians hurt or killed on 30mph speed limit roads is VASTLY higher than any others.

I'm not raving about this change either, but the data does show that when you reduce speeds you reduce the impact of collisions and therefore reduce the most negative outcomes and it provide greater time for motorists to see pedestrians, and pedestrians to see motorists. 

ok ill bet you any money now we see more 20 mph roads we see more injuries and fatalties in 20 mph zones, the current stats are skewed due to the numbers . The reason more people are currently injured in 30 mph zones is becuse there a lot more 30 mph zones. Let’s see these stats in a years time

I’d love to hear why you think there’d be more fatalities on a 20mph road. 

Hilarious seeing the loonies signing a petition as if they’re gonna revert back to 30mph. 


Posted By: scarletpimp
Date Posted: 20 September 2023 at 3:39am
The hot air generated on this thread is laughable.LOL

My wife and I WALK in and around Llanelli quite a lot.
We also live in an existing 20mph (limit PRIOR to the new limits coming in to effect on Sunday).
Do people stick to the limits..do they hell !
I walked Llanelli today and saw people speeding around.
The police are not going to do anything , so as we live in a "free for all " society, people do what they want.
Nothing will change.

Historically,  it was Barbara Castle , then minister of Transport(1965-68), who brought  in restrictions.
In Feb. 1966 Castle addressed Parliament , calling for profound change in public attitudes" to curtail increasing road fatality figures, stating "Hitler did did not manage to kill as many civilians in Britain's have have been killed on the roads ,since the war". The statistics bore out; between 1945 and the mid 1960's 150,00 were killed and several million injured on Britain's roads.
The situation is 100 times worse now, with more and more cars on the road.

According to various road safety organisations including the AA & RAC, many local authorities representing 28 million people in the UK have declared the national 30mph limit as no longer fit for purpose for most of their urban and village streets and replaced it with 20mph limits.

Another interesting statistic, research unveiled  at the recent COP26 climate conference, revealed that a 20mph can reduce Co2 and people harming NOx by more than 25%.
With transport representing 27% of the total carbon emissions in the UK, then reducing it by a quarter, is a substantive measure that can easily taken to reduce climate warming

"Brake", the road safety charity, reported that every 16 minutes someone is killed or seriously injured on UK roads. In total 1,6008 were killed in 2021, with deaths up 20% on 2020.
The police recorded that 30% of deaths were attributed to drivers exceeding the speed limit.

Last year a motorcyclist was very seriously injured turning right in to Walters rd towards Bigyn hill.
Dreadful parking meant that visibility was partly obscured, but what caused the severity of the collision, was the car travelling down Walters rd at speed. This led to the 20mph being introduced.
I also saw a pensioner being knocked over at the crossing, from pottery street to Asda in Llanelli, simply because the car was going to fast to stop quickly. The poor woman suffered a cardiac arrest, and despite our best efforts, died in the ambulance before it could get to Glangwili

As I understand it there is no "blanket ban" and local authorities can administer a 30mph were  they think appropriate. There is no doubt however that 'technically' our streets are safer at 20mph, but as I stated in my opening intro..it will make little difference as people still do as they like.

Cars are 'Gods' in todays world are we are  afraid not attempt to step on the motorists shoes.
Back in Barbara Castle's day, she introduced the 70mph on motorways, and met the same outrage as the people who signed the recent petition. 
The metaphorical comparison, of course is of a blinkered dray horse plodding on blissful unaware of what is going on around it.
Until it affects them , specifically, if their child or elderly parent was killed or badly injured in a collision, by someone driving too fast, people  will shake their fist in protest that their "freedoms " have been appallingly infringed upon.
We are living in a rootless society devoid of morality and conviction. People will even block disable person access with their car, as has happened to my elderly  neighbour on a few occasions. A complete lack of thought , consideration or compassion

To digress, the law, is a joke when it comes to  offending linked to driving at speed 
A man recently killed 3 people, after driving furiously being well over the limit, and received just a 17 month jail sentence. How can that be fair ?
I have said for a long time that depending on the severity of offence, lifetime driving bans should be introduced for drink drivers

The Tories in the Senydd are also to be condemned. Andrew T Davis what  a scumbag (and big Boris fan) he is. Initially there was cross party consensus initially, when the 20mph limit was proposed, and trialled in eight different locations , going back some time. Since then Davies and his rag tag bunch of toe rag Tories have sniffed out a political opportunity and are now banging the drum in opposition to 20mph, telling lies about blanket bans.
Yes, its the same Tories who opposed the setting up of the NHS, the introduction of the minimum wage, and even devolution itself , and yet there they are banging the drum.

To conclude on a almost comical note ,apart from the fact its deadly serious.
We have been debating on here about the 20mph limits.
One of the thing that has amazed me recently that with the proliferation of electric scooters, how long is going to be before someone gets killed or injured on these things?
I am not of course referring to vespers/mopeds, but the type of scooter that as a child you used to propel with your foot.
Most of these are operated by children around our streets , without a helmet, and are incredibly dangerous, both for themselves  and pedestrians.
How can parents be so irresponsible to allow this, but if (god forbid) an accident happened then there would be a fuss.

Its just another example of the Laissez-Faire attitudes which prevail today







-------------
I stood yer on tanner bank


Posted By: roy munster
Date Posted: 20 September 2023 at 12:10pm
Originally posted by scarletpimp scarletpimp wrote:

The hot air generated on this thread is laughable.LOL

My wife and I WALK in and around Llanelli quite a lot.
We also live in an existing 20mph (limit PRIOR to the new limits coming in to effect on Sunday).
Do people stick to the limits..do they hell !
I walked Llanelli today and saw people speeding around.
The police are not going to do anything , so as we live in a "free for all " society, people do what they want.
Nothing will change.

Historically,  it was Barbara Castle , then minister of Transport(1965-68), who brought  in restrictions.
In Feb. 1966 Castle addressed Parliament , calling for profound change in public attitudes" to curtail increasing road fatality figures, stating "Hitler did did not manage to kill as many civilians in Britain's have have been killed on the roads ,since the war". The statistics bore out; between 1945 and the mid 1960's 150,00 were killed and several million injured on Britain's roads.
The situation is 100 times worse now, with more and more cars on the road.

According to various road safety organisations including the AA & RAC, many local authorities representing 28 million people in the UK have declared the national 30mph limit as no longer fit for purpose for most of their urban and village streets and replaced it with 20mph limits.

Another interesting statistic, research unveiled  at the recent COP26 climate conference, revealed that a 20mph can reduce Co2 and people harming NOx by more than 25%.
With transport representing 27% of the total carbon emissions in the UK, then reducing it by a quarter, is a substantive measure that can easily taken to reduce climate warming

"Brake", the road safety charity, reported that every 16 minutes someone is killed or seriously injured on UK roads. In total 1,6008 were killed in 2021, with deaths up 20% on 2020.
The police recorded that 30% of deaths were attributed to drivers exceeding the speed limit.

Last year a motorcyclist was very seriously injured turning right in to Walters rd towards Bigyn hill.
Dreadful parking meant that visibility was partly obscured, but what caused the severity of the collision, was the car travelling down Walters rd at speed. This led to the 20mph being introduced.
I also saw a pensioner being knocked over at the crossing, from pottery street to Asda in Llanelli, simply because the car was going to fast to stop quickly. The poor woman suffered a cardiac arrest, and despite our best efforts, died in the ambulance before it could get to Glangwili

As I understand it there is no "blanket ban" and local authorities can administer a 30mph were  they think appropriate. There is no doubt however that 'technically' our streets are safer at 20mph, but as I stated in my opening intro..it will make little difference as people still do as they like.

Cars are 'Gods' in todays world are we are  afraid not attempt to step on the motorists shoes.
Back in Barbara Castle's day, she introduced the 70mph on motorways, and met the same outrage as the people who signed the recent petition. 
The metaphorical comparison, of course is of a blinkered dray horse plodding on blissful unaware of what is going on around it.
Until it affects them , specifically, if their child or elderly parent was killed or badly injured in a collision, by someone driving too fast, people  will shake their fist in protest that their "freedoms " have been appallingly infringed upon.
We are living in a rootless society devoid of morality and conviction. People will even block disable person access with their car, as has happened to my elderly  neighbour on a few occasions. A complete lack of thought , consideration or compassion

To digress, the law, is a joke when it comes to  offending linked to driving at speed 
A man recently killed 3 people, after driving furiously being well over the limit, and received just a 17 month jail sentence. How can that be fair ?
I have said for a long time that depending on the severity of offence, lifetime driving bans should be introduced for drink drivers

The Tories in the Senydd are also to be condemned. Andrew T Davis what  a scumbag (and big Boris fan) he is. Initially there was cross party consensus initially, when the 20mph limit was proposed, and trialled in eight different locations , going back some time. Since then Davies and his rag tag bunch of toe rag Tories have sniffed out a political opportunity and are now banging the drum in opposition to 20mph, telling lies about blanket bans.
Yes, its the same Tories who opposed the setting up of the NHS, the introduction of the minimum wage, and even devolution itself , and yet there they are banging the drum.

To conclude on a almost comical note ,apart from the fact its deadly serious.
We have been debating on here about the 20mph limits.
One of the thing that has amazed me recently that with the proliferation of electric scooters, how long is going to be before someone gets killed or injured on these things?
I am not of course referring to vespers/mopeds, but the type of scooter that as a child you used to propel with your foot.
Most of these are operated by children around our streets , without a helmet, and are incredibly dangerous, both for themselves  and pedestrians.
How can parents be so irresponsible to allow this, but if (god forbid) an accident happened then there would be a fuss.

Its just another example of the Laissez-Faire attitudes which prevail today






whats the to speed on those scooters , do they wear helmets and do they use lights?


-------------
ROYMOND MUNTER MBE (FOR SERVICES TO THE COMBOVER)


Posted By: roy munster
Date Posted: 20 September 2023 at 12:22pm
Originally posted by SA14 SA14 wrote:

Originally posted by RR1972 RR1972 wrote:

Originally posted by Raised By Peregos Raised By Peregos wrote:

"It's not it's pretty much all roads in built up areas" - Roy

Yes, of course it's built-up areas... that's the point. They are the dangerous roads for pedestrians, which this is predominantly aimed at protecting. Roads that don't really have pedestrians will be exempt. The limit is mostly to reduce pedestrian casualties... for you and RR, I don't know how you can look at those statistics and NOT see the amount of pedestrians hurt or killed on 30mph speed limit roads is VASTLY higher than any others.

I'm not raving about this change either, but the data does show that when you reduce speeds you reduce the impact of collisions and therefore reduce the most negative outcomes and it provide greater time for motorists to see pedestrians, and pedestrians to see motorists. 

ok ill bet you any money now we see more 20 mph roads we see more injuries and fatalties in 20 mph zones, the current stats are skewed due to the numbers . The reason more people are currently injured in 30 mph zones is becuse there a lot more 30 mph zones. Let’s see these stats in a years time

I’d love to hear why you think there’d be more fatalities on a 20mph road. 

Hilarious seeing the loonies signing a petition as if they’re gonna revert back to 30mph. 

Pretty disrespectful calling 160,000 people loons but to be expected of you

The reasons for more accidents and confusion with the new speed limits and unmarked speed limits have been well documented in this thread and elsewhere you conveniently ignore the facts. The complete confusion over the wrong speed signs putting 30mph signs in 20mph roads ....Added to the endless speed bumps, pot holes , wide pavements, central islands, one way streets, part one way streets more and more road works extra traffic lights , extra congestion, more cameras, more pressure on the cops to police it all, roads you can only drive down at certain times of the day , cutbacks on maintenance and relief roads , Higher pollution with cars in lower gears and tyre pollution from the endless braking.....

DPFs diesel particulate filters endlessly clogged up thrugh the endless stop starting  Do you know how much it costs to clean or replace a DPF>?? £800 to clean , to replace brand new £2780 ??? How many can afford that? etc All puts yet more pressure and distraction on drivers on all their varies types of vehicles...Isnt it hard enough to drive big trucks and buses already without all this extra pressure and confusion ....End result will be more people quitting these jobs. far slower supply of goods , services, essential supplies, foods, medication, productivity down....a £4.5 billion hit to the welsh economy (These are welsh labours own estimations so itll probably be greater) . 

You conveniently choose to ignore all of this which makes your opinion n the matter worthless.


-------------
ROYMOND MUNTER MBE (FOR SERVICES TO THE COMBOVER)


Posted By: RR1972
Date Posted: 20 September 2023 at 2:08pm
Originally posted by SA14 SA14 wrote:

Originally posted by RR1972 RR1972 wrote:

Originally posted by Raised By Peregos Raised By Peregos wrote:

"It's not it's pretty much all roads in built up areas" - Roy

Yes, of course it's built-up areas... that's the point. They are the dangerous roads for pedestrians, which this is predominantly aimed at protecting. Roads that don't really have pedestrians will be exempt. The limit is mostly to reduce pedestrian casualties... for you and RR, I don't know how you can look at those statistics and NOT see the amount of pedestrians hurt or killed on 30mph speed limit roads is VASTLY higher than any others.

I'm not raving about this change either, but the data does show that when you reduce speeds you reduce the impact of collisions and therefore reduce the most negative outcomes and it provide greater time for motorists to see pedestrians, and pedestrians to see motorists. 

ok ill bet you any money now we see more 20 mph roads we see more injuries and fatalties in 20 mph zones, the current stats are skewed due to the numbers . The reason more people are currently injured in 30 mph zones is becuse there a lot more 30 mph zones. Let’s see these stats in a years time

I’d love to hear why you think there’d be more fatalities on a 20mph road. 

Hilarious seeing the loonies signing a petition as if they’re gonna revert back to 30mph. 
 there will be more fataliitues on 20 mph as there willbe more 20 mph  roads. There will be less fatalities on 30 mph roads as there will be less 30 mph. It’s just a numbers game. If the total numbers of deaths dont fall what next?  Do we go to 10 mph then?


Posted By: RR1972
Date Posted: 20 September 2023 at 2:10pm
Originally posted by scarletpimp scarletpimp wrote:

The hot air generated on this thread is laughable.LOL

My wife and I WALK in and around Llanelli quite a lot.
We also live in an existing 20mph (limit PRIOR to the new limits coming in to effect on Sunday).
Do people stick to the limits..do they hell !
I walked Llanelli today and saw people speeding around.
The police are not going to do anything , so as we live in a "free for all " society, people do what they want.
Nothing will change.

Historically,  it was Barbara Castle , then minister of Transport(1965-68), who brought  in restrictions.
In Feb. 1966 Castle addressed Parliament , calling for profound change in public attitudes" to curtail increasing road fatality figures, stating "Hitler did did not manage to kill as many civilians in Britain's have have been killed on the roads ,since the war". The statistics bore out; between 1945 and the mid 1960's 150,00 were killed and several million injured on Britain's roads.
The situation is 100 times worse now, with more and more cars on the road.

According to various road safety organisations including the AA & RAC, many local authorities representing 28 million people in the UK have declared the national 30mph limit as no longer fit for purpose for most of their urban and village streets and replaced it with 20mph limits.

Another interesting statistic, research unveiled  at the recent COP26 climate conference, revealed that a 20mph can reduce Co2 and people harming NOx by more than 25%.
With transport representing 27% of the total carbon emissions in the UK, then reducing it by a quarter, is a substantive measure that can easily taken to reduce climate warming

"Brake", the road safety charity, reported that every 16 minutes someone is killed or seriously injured on UK roads. In total 1,6008 were killed in 2021, with deaths up 20% on 2020.
The police recorded that 30% of deaths were attributed to drivers exceeding the speed limit.

Last year a motorcyclist was very seriously injured turning right in to Walters rd towards Bigyn hill.
Dreadful parking meant that visibility was partly obscured, but what caused the severity of the collision, was the car travelling down Walters rd at speed. This led to the 20mph being introduced.
I also saw a pensioner being knocked over at the crossing, from pottery street to Asda in Llanelli, simply because the car was going to fast to stop quickly. The poor woman suffered a cardiac arrest, and despite our best efforts, died in the ambulance before it could get to Glangwili

As I understand it there is no "blanket ban" and local authorities can administer a 30mph were  they think appropriate. There is no doubt however that 'technically' our streets are safer at 20mph, but as I stated in my opening intro..it will make little difference as people still do as they like.

Cars are 'Gods' in todays world are we are  afraid not attempt to step on the motorists shoes.
Back in Barbara Castle's day, she introduced the 70mph on motorways, and met the same outrage as the people who signed the recent petition. 
The metaphorical comparison, of course is of a blinkered dray horse plodding on blissful unaware of what is going on around it.
Until it affects them , specifically, if their child or elderly parent was killed or badly injured in a collision, by someone driving too fast, people  will shake their fist in protest that their "freedoms " have been appallingly infringed upon.
We are living in a rootless society devoid of morality and conviction. People will even block disable person access with their car, as has happened to my elderly  neighbour on a few occasions. A complete lack of thought , consideration or compassion

To digress, the law, is a joke when it comes to  offending linked to driving at speed 
A man recently killed 3 people, after driving furiously being well over the limit, and received just a 17 month jail sentence. How can that be fair ?
I have said for a long time that depending on the severity of offence, lifetime driving bans should be introduced for drink drivers

The Tories in the Senydd are also to be condemned. Andrew T Davis what  a scumbag (and big Boris fan) he is. Initially there was cross party consensus initially, when the 20mph limit was proposed, and trialled in eight different locations , going back some time. Since then Davies and his rag tag bunch of toe rag Tories have sniffed out a political opportunity and are now banging the drum in opposition to 20mph, telling lies about blanket bans.
Yes, its the same Tories who opposed the setting up of the NHS, the introduction of the minimum wage, and even devolution itself , and yet there they are banging the drum.

To conclude on a almost comical note ,apart from the fact its deadly serious.
We have been debating on here about the 20mph limits.
One of the thing that has amazed me recently that with the proliferation of electric scooters, how long is going to be before someone gets killed or injured on these things?
I am not of course referring to vespers/mopeds, but the type of scooter that as a child you used to propel with your foot.
Most of these are operated by children around our streets , without a helmet, and are incredibly dangerous, both for themselves  and pedestrians.
How can parents be so irresponsible to allow this, but if (god forbid) an accident happened then there would be a fuss.

Its just another example of the Laissez-Faire attitudes which prevail today





pretty sure mote than 150 000 people from the uk died in ww2 to be honest. Speed cameras will catch speeders not police on patrol. You be lucky to see any police out and about now tbh. A few more may help cut down on all these lunkheads driving like they are in  fornula 1 


Posted By: Fscarlet
Date Posted: 20 September 2023 at 2:31pm
I think the main roads should stay at 30 & then the residential roads coming off the main roads should be down to 20mph.


Posted By: roy munster
Date Posted: 20 September 2023 at 3:50pm
Originally posted by Fscarlet Fscarlet wrote:

I think the main roads should stay at 30 & then the residential roads coming off the main roads should be down to 20mph.
and marked properly

https://petitions.senedd.wales/signatures/2022812/signed" rel="nofollow - https://petitions.senedd.wales/signatures/2022812/signed
Petition has over 340,000 signatures now the biggest in Welsh history
drakefords response? we dont care were not relooking at it
ahh what a democrat he is Wink


-------------
ROYMOND MUNTER MBE (FOR SERVICES TO THE COMBOVER)


Posted By: Eastern outpost
Date Posted: 20 September 2023 at 4:18pm
I never envisaged this debate when I asked my simple question about how it affected people getting to PyS from the usual access points - M4 and/or other main entry roads.

Whatever the rules are, there will always be folk who ignore the rules and are inconsiderate to everyone else whether on the road or pavements. While none of those people read Fever, we probably can all come up with a few folk of this type.


-------------
In a world where you can be anything – Be Kind.


Posted By: greypower1
Date Posted: 20 September 2023 at 4:22pm
Originally posted by Fscarlet Fscarlet wrote:

I think the main roads should stay at 30 & then the residential roads coming off the main roads should be down to 20mph.

The problem with that idea is that the majority of main roads are also residential roads.


-------------
Keep the faith


Posted By: roy munster
Date Posted: 20 September 2023 at 4:32pm
Originally posted by Eastern outpost Eastern outpost wrote:

I never envisaged this debate when I asked my simple question about how it affected people getting to PyS from the usual access points - M4 and/or other main entry roads.

Whatever the rules are, there will always be folk who ignore the rules and are inconsiderate to everyone else whether on the road or pavements. While none of those people read Fever, we probably can all come up with a few folk of this type.

Statistics published by the Department for Transport shows an estimated 719,000 vehicles are being used despite their vehicle excise duty (VED) not being paid. This represents 1.8% of vehicles, up from 1.6% in 2019 when the total was 634,000.


-------------
ROYMOND MUNTER MBE (FOR SERVICES TO THE COMBOVER)


Posted By: scarletpimp
Date Posted: 21 September 2023 at 3:57am
To follow on from my last point of my last contribution regarding "Scooters".
Today, my wife and I were walking back from town up pottery street, when I could see a lad coming down Bigyn hill on one of these motorised scooters.
I am not sure what, if any braking power these contraptions have, but this was certainly going in excess of 20pmh, probably more than 30mph, probably aided by the steep hill.
He came to the junction of Ann st and clearly either could not or would not stop.
if any vehicle had been travelling up the Wern or Ann street, then he could easily have been killed or seriously injured.
As it was the lack and control and speed meant he careered across the road in to the door of the shop at the top of pottery street. Any elderly person coming out of the shop would have been at risk of injury.

Leave alone the 20mph limit and cars, I just cannot understand how this is happening and what about the legal responsibility the parents of these individuals, got if they cause an accident.


-------------
I stood yer on tanner bank


Posted By: RR1972
Date Posted: 21 September 2023 at 7:57am
Originally posted by greypower1 greypower1 wrote:

Originally posted by Fscarlet Fscarlet wrote:

I think the main roads should stay at 30 & then the residential roads coming off the main roads should be down to 20mph.

The problem with that idea is that the majority of main roads are also residential roads.
ok so if fatalties don’t fall what next 10 mph?, the reason there are more  deaths on residential roafs is because rhere are more residential roads than other roads in the uk. It’s not cos pf the speed limit  involved


Posted By: RR1972
Date Posted: 21 September 2023 at 8:01am
Originally posted by scarletpimp scarletpimp wrote:

To follow on from my last point of my last contribution regarding "Scooters".
Today, my wife and I were walking back from town up pottery street, when I could see a lad coming down Bigyn hill on one of these motorised scooters.
I am not sure what, if any braking power these contraptions have, but this was certainly going in excess of 20pmh, probably more than 30mph, probably aided by the steep hill.
He came to the junction of Ann st and clearly either could not or would not stop.
if any vehicle had been travelling up the Wern or Ann street, then he could easily have been killed or seriously injured.
As it was the lack and control and speed meant he careered across the road in to the door of the shop at the top of pottery street. Any elderly person coming out of the shop would have been at risk of injury.

Leave alone the 20mph limit and cars, I just cannot understand how this is happening and what about the legal responsibility the parents of these individuals, got if they cause an accident.
i have no doubt a losd of these  scooter users all ovet the uk are selling drug or up to some other nefarious use.They are not insured can be modified to go faster, can’t be caught on foot and can go to parts of an atea cars cant follow. You should have to take a test and insure them if they are to be used on a general highway. It’s the same with these xl bullys a dog that was literally bred for fighting, why would joe public need/wamt one pf these?


Posted By: roy munster
Date Posted: 21 September 2023 at 1:32pm
Originally posted by RR1972 RR1972 wrote:

Originally posted by scarletpimp scarletpimp wrote:

To follow on from my last point of my last contribution regarding "Scooters".
Today, my wife and I were walking back from town up pottery street, when I could see a lad coming down Bigyn hill on one of these motorised scooters.
I am not sure what, if any braking power these contraptions have, but this was certainly going in excess of 20pmh, probably more than 30mph, probably aided by the steep hill.
He came to the junction of Ann st and clearly either could not or would not stop.
if any vehicle had been travelling up the Wern or Ann street, then he could easily have been killed or seriously injured.
As it was the lack and control and speed meant he careered across the road in to the door of the shop at the top of pottery street. Any elderly person coming out of the shop would have been at risk of injury.

Leave alone the 20mph limit and cars, I just cannot understand how this is happening and what about the legal responsibility the parents of these individuals, got if they cause an accident.
i have no doubt a losd of these  scooter users all ovet the uk are selling drug or up to some other nefarious use.They are not insured can be modified to go faster, can’t be caught on foot and can go to parts of an atea cars cant follow. You should have to take a test and insure them if they are to be used on a general highway. It’s the same with these xl bullys a dog that was literally bred for fighting, why would joe public need/wamt one pf these?

Undoubtedly Apparently only 1 in 10 drug dealers ges to jail
I havent double checked that but clearly the war on drugs never happened and our status quo policy of the govt providing the drugs and the police turning a blind eye to it all, is now set in stone and goes unquestioned by politicians and councillors

Apparently accepting its incurable unavoidable genetic disease is the only way to go and is termed compassionate. The idea of self control or helping to proactively dissuade people from this path in the first place is scoffed at by the so called experts. Is that compassinate? Funny Ive not seen them display the same compassion to communities ravaged and destroyed by drug dealers 


-------------
ROYMOND MUNTER MBE (FOR SERVICES TO THE COMBOVER)


Posted By: scarletpimp
Date Posted: 21 September 2023 at 1:59pm
Originally posted by roy munster roy munster wrote:

Originally posted by RR1972 RR1972 wrote:

Originally posted by scarletpimp scarletpimp wrote:

To follow on from my last point of my last contribution regarding "Scooters".
Today, my wife and I were walking back from town up pottery street, when I could see a lad coming down Bigyn hill on one of these motorised scooters.
I am not sure what, if any braking power these contraptions have, but this was certainly going in excess of 20pmh, probably more than 30mph, probably aided by the steep hill.
He came to the junction of Ann st and clearly either could not or would not stop.
if any vehicle had been travelling up the Wern or Ann street, then he could easily have been killed or seriously injured.
As it was the lack and control and speed meant he careered across the road in to the door of the shop at the top of pottery street. Any elderly person coming out of the shop would have been at risk of injury.

Leave alone the 20mph limit and cars, I just cannot understand how this is happening and what about the legal responsibility the parents of these individuals, got if they cause an accident.
i have no doubt a losd of these  scooter users all ovet the uk are selling drug or up to some other nefarious use.They are not insured can be modified to go faster, can’t be caught on foot and can go to parts of an atea cars cant follow. You should have to take a test and insure them if they are to be used on a general highway. It’s the same with these xl bullys a dog that was literally bred for fighting, why would joe public need/wamt one pf these?

Undoubtedly Apparently only 1 in 10 drug dealers ges to jail
I havent double checked that but clearly the war on drugs never happened and our status quo policy of the govt providing the drugs and the police turning a blind eye to it all, is now set in stone and goes unquestioned by politicians and councillors

Apparently accepting its incurable unavoidable genetic disease is the only way to go and is termed compassionate. The idea of self control or helping to proactively dissuade people from this path in the first place is scoffed at by the so called experts. Is that compassinate? Funny Ive not seen them display the same compassion to communities ravaged and destroyed by drug dealers 

I have not seen these scooters on display Roy, but they must ge available somewhere. RIDICULOUS. 
Another thing, many if the roadside curbs in and around  Central Llanelli,  are non existent.  I live next to just one fine example , and a fairly busy road.
Complained to counci, nothing done..presumably  no money .
Any limited protection,  you would get from a curg is negated.
We have two primary  schools and a secondary  school on our doorstep, and children  are regularly  walking home.
They would have no chance if a scooter mounted the pavement .
My wife has a f8rm of early onset dementia,  and ,bye way things are, I am always with her when we go out, because even though it can be quiet at times, it only raies a second of madness to witness an unfortunate  and potentially  danger accident. 
Spoke to police ahd they confirmed   children shouldn't be using them.
So where are their parents of tyese children?
Absent without leave, until a tragedy  occurs.
It worries me.


-------------
I stood yer on tanner bank


Posted By: roy munster
Date Posted: 21 September 2023 at 2:22pm
Theyre great fun for the kids but with no regulation or rules its dangerous ........Theyre often on the wrong side of the road no lights on, often holding phones or drinks in their hand at the same time, it a tragedy waiting to happen tbh

-------------
ROYMOND MUNTER MBE (FOR SERVICES TO THE COMBOVER)



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net