There's so much to comment on here, I did observe in another thread the so-called "communication age" is in reality the "loudmouth age", where we've seen the monetisation of extremist views. I e. It doesn't really matter what you're saying, only that it is as polarised as possible and offends. 

Such extremism have always existed of course but the real danger is it is a actively targeting vulnerable groups in a manner that is completely unregulated.

So, whilst I think the individuals to be utterly despicable and obnoxious, they have really just worked out a way to make money off something. That such platforms can host hate - or how it is vulnerable and under age groups access it - should also be targeted. If a library had such uninformed hate speech filled books as those "influencers" were spouting it would be restricted to over 18s only or, more likely, closed down. 

We live in a  sad, sick Society,  where people can anonymously  denigrate others online.  Pathetic  scumbags.

As for " infuencers"  what a complete joke. Why do people need to be

 " influenced '? Can't  they think for themselves?

The quicker we introduce  an intelligence  test, similar to that of a driving theory  test...if you fail you don't  vote. You can of course reapply , just like a driving test