WRU Board at PyS today!
Printed From: Scarlet Fever Llanelli Rugby Sport Wales Tickets
Category: RUGBY
Forum Name: SCARLETS GENERAL
Forum Description: Team News, Season Tickets, Next Match
URL: https://scarletfever.org/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=48588
Printed Date: 27 March 2026 at 3:15am Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: WRU Board at PyS today!
Posted By: Derwynfawr
Subject: WRU Board at PyS today!
Date Posted: 25 March 2026 at 5:03pm
|
It looks like something is happening as I was at the club shop today and Reddin etc were all going into the reception area, supposedly meeting our board today.
Hopefully positive news.
------------- D Fraw
|
Replies:
Posted By: glyndwr
Date Posted: 25 March 2026 at 5:43pm
Any more news on this?
------------- Yma O Hyd.
|
Posted By: Seagultaf
Date Posted: 25 March 2026 at 6:16pm
|
Probably having another shot at getting Scarlets to agree to a merger with the Ospreys. Because that looks like the only way they are now going to get down to three teams.
|
Posted By: 157cb
Date Posted: 25 March 2026 at 6:20pm
Posted By: Tony Clifton
Date Posted: 25 March 2026 at 6:22pm
|
Need a StradeyBoyo update!
|
Posted By: RR1972
Date Posted: 25 March 2026 at 6:29pm
brnging our court settlement pay out down in cash
|
Posted By: Scrletsfan32x
Date Posted: 25 March 2026 at 6:34pm
Tony Clifton wrote:
Need a StradeyBoyo update! | He’s gone AWOL on us.
|
Posted By: Tony Clifton
Date Posted: 25 March 2026 at 6:37pm
RR1972 wrote:
brnging our court settlement pay out down in cash |
Bringing us a few massive locks to carry the cash as well.
|
Posted By: ladram
Date Posted: 25 March 2026 at 6:46pm
Scrletsfan32x wrote:
Tony Clifton wrote:
Need a StradeyBoyo update! | He’s gone AWOL on us. |
He reads it most mornings
|
Posted By: Abbey
Date Posted: 25 March 2026 at 7:13pm
Really don’t want to be negative today but the WRU turning up at PyS the day after a very positive news day for the Ospreys doesn’t hit me as a good thing. Maybe our board is spooked and have asked for talks? The uncertainty won’t be helping our preparations for 26/27.
|
Posted By: ap sior
Date Posted: 25 March 2026 at 7:27pm
Abbey wrote:
Really don’t want to be negative today but the WRU turning up at PyS the day after a very positive news day for the Ospreys doesn’t hit me as a good thing. Maybe our board is spooked and have asked for talks? The uncertainty won’t be helping our preparations for 26/27.
|
This may have been longstanding engagement. Alternatively, SCC made their announcement today knowing that the WRU Board were at PyS.
|
Posted By: Abbey
Date Posted: 25 March 2026 at 7:55pm
ap sior wrote:
Abbey wrote:
Really don’t want to be negative today but the WRU turning up at PyS the day after a very positive news day for the Ospreys doesn’t hit me as a good thing. Maybe our board is spooked and have asked for talks? The uncertainty won’t be helping our preparations for 26/27.
|
This may have been longstanding engagement. Alternatively, SCC made their announcement today knowing that the WRU Board were at PyS.
|
You can tell that I’m not a glass full/half empty person. I’m “there’s no bloody glass at all” 😂
|
Posted By: ap sior
Date Posted: 25 March 2026 at 7:58pm
Abbey wrote:
ap sior wrote:
Abbey wrote:
Really don’t want to be negative today but the WRU turning up at PyS the day after a very positive news day for the Ospreys doesn’t hit me as a good thing. Maybe our board is spooked and have asked for talks? The uncertainty won’t be helping our preparations for 26/27.
|
This may have been longstanding engagement. Alternatively, SCC made their announcement today knowing that the WRU Board were at PyS.
|
You can tell that I’m not a glass full/half empty person. I’m “there’s no bloody glass at all” 😂
|
|
Posted By: Fscarlet
Date Posted: 25 March 2026 at 7:58pm
|
Some of them down in Whitland now no doubt for the district meeting.
|
Posted By: skyblue
Date Posted: 25 March 2026 at 8:04pm
Fscarlet wrote:
Some of them down in Whitland now no doubt for the district meeting. |
Let me guess Reddin & his enforcer Manders?
------------- KRR
|
Posted By: Tony Clifton
Date Posted: 25 March 2026 at 8:16pm
Abbey wrote:
Really don’t want to be negative today but the WRU turning up at PyS the day after a very positive news day for the Ospreys doesn’t hit me as a good thing. Maybe our board is spooked and have asked for talks? The uncertainty won’t be helping our preparations for 26/27.
|
Doesn’t change the fact the ospreys direct owners want to buy Cardiff and have looked to offload the Ospreys numerous times.
|
Posted By: Wasp
Date Posted: 25 March 2026 at 8:31pm
Tony Clifton wrote:
Abbey wrote:
Really don’t want to be negative today but the WRU turning up at PyS the day after a very positive news day for the Ospreys doesn’t hit me as a good thing. Maybe our board is spooked and have asked for talks? The uncertainty won’t be helping our preparations for 26/27.
|
Doesn’t change the fact the ospreys direct owners want to buy Cardiff and have looked to offload the Ospreys numerous times. |
Yep. And Rob Davies ain’t going to put £2m a year in by himself.
------------- We're still still here, but I wish we were in an Anglo-Welsh
|
Posted By: ap sior
Date Posted: 25 March 2026 at 9:12pm
Wasp wrote:
Tony Clifton wrote:
Abbey wrote:
Really don’t want to be negative today but the WRU turning up at PyS the day after a very positive news day for the Ospreys doesn’t hit me as a good thing. Maybe our board is spooked and have asked for talks? The uncertainty won’t be helping our preparations for 26/27.
|
Doesn’t change the fact the ospreys direct owners want to buy Cardiff and have looked to offload the Ospreys numerous times. |
Yep. And Rob Davies ain’t going to put £2m a year in by himself. |
Any idea how much he put in when he saved them in 2019.
|
Posted By: surfing-mtber
Date Posted: 25 March 2026 at 9:26pm
Abbey wrote:
ap sior wrote:
Abbey wrote:
Really don’t want to be negative today but the WRU turning up at PyS the day after a very positive news day for the Ospreys doesn’t hit me as a good thing. Maybe our board is spooked and have asked for talks? The uncertainty won’t be helping our preparations for 26/27.
|
This may have been longstanding engagement. Alternatively, SCC made their announcement today knowing that the WRU Board were at PyS.
|
You can tell that I’m not a glass full/half empty person. I’m “there’s no bloody glass at all” 😂
|
Or, why is that glass twice as big as it needs to be? 
------------- Joshua24:15
|
Posted By: Wasp
Date Posted: 25 March 2026 at 10:16pm
ap sior wrote:
Wasp wrote:
Tony Clifton wrote:
Abbey wrote:
Really don’t want to be negative today but the WRU turning up at PyS the day after a very positive news day for the Ospreys doesn’t hit me as a good thing. Maybe our board is spooked and have asked for talks? The uncertainty won’t be helping our preparations for 26/27.
|
Doesn’t change the fact the ospreys direct owners want to buy Cardiff and have looked to offload the Ospreys numerous times. |
Yep. And Rob Davies ain’t going to put £2m a year in by himself. |
Any idea how much he put in when he saved them in 2019. |
That was more a case of leadership than money, although Os were losing less then than now, but I think Mike James was running the show until Rob picked up a newspaper and realised his team was about to be swallowed up by Nigel Short.
------------- We're still still here, but I wish we were in an Anglo-Welsh
|
Posted By: Redadare
Date Posted: 25 March 2026 at 11:21pm
|
Hell of a coincidence though.....and Im guessing they will have to put the 3 licenses out to tender now,Os were never going to roll over,I think this could be real trouble not just for the wru but for us aswell.
|
Posted By: Tony Clifton
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 1:15am
Redadare wrote:
Hell of a coincidence though.....and Im guessing they will have to put the 3 licenses out to tender now,Os were never going to roll over,I think this could be real trouble not just for the wru but for us aswell. |
Tender seems likely, and the latest developments don’t work in our favour. Incredibly frustrating. I wish we managed to just sign PRA25 before the Dragons did.
|
Posted By: gnasher1975
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 6:43am
Tony Clifton wrote:
Redadare wrote:
Hell of a coincidence though.....and Im guessing they will have to put the 3 licenses out to tender now,Os were never going to roll over,I think this could be real trouble not just for the wru but for us aswell. |
Tender seems likely, and the latest developments don’t work in our favour. Incredibly frustrating. I wish we managed to just sign PRA25 before the Dragons did. |
Out of interest which bit doesn't work in our favour?
Which bit of the potential ospreys proposal would out weigh our potential proposal?
Not saying our survival is a given.... Just curious.
|
Posted By: Fscarlet
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 7:31am
Tony Clifton wrote:
Redadare wrote:
Hell of a coincidence though.....and Im guessing they will have to put the 3 licenses out to tender now,Os were never going to roll over,I think this could be real trouble not just for the wru but for us aswell. |
Tender seems likely, and the latest developments don’t work in our favour. Incredibly frustrating. I wish we managed to just sign PRA25 before the Dragons did. |
Very much so, WRU reps last night said this is now the likely outcome.
|
Posted By: Paul10
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 7:36am
Out of interest which bit doesn't work in our favour?
Which bit of the potential ospreys proposal would out weigh our potential proposal?
Not saying our survival is a given.... Just curious. [/QUOTE]
Population size is the main one.
|
Posted By: PE SA
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 8:14am
|
With the tender being for a West Wales team, population is the same for both teams no ? Although Ospreys are fighting the case for swansea and only swansea, scarlets have fought for West wales. The key imo.
|
Posted By: Wil Chips
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 9:40am
Good to read of face to face dialogue, and the WRU moving out of Tierney Towers to do so.
|
Posted By: RR1972
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 9:53am
|
it’s a nonsense either are even considered to be cut. id love to see “the data” that says the dragons have to stay and a west wales region shut. more wru rubbish
|
Posted By: GPR - Rochester
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 10:02am
RR1972 wrote:
it’s a nonsense either are even considered to be cut. id love to see “the data” that says the dragons have to stay and a west wales region shut. more wru rubbish |
Its to do with chimneys apparently. 
|
Posted By: ladram
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 10:11am
GPR - Rochester wrote:
RR1972 wrote:
it’s a nonsense either are even considered to be cut. id love to see “the data” that says the dragons have to stay and a west wales region shut. more wru rubbish |
Its to do with chimneys apparently.  |
It will be my fault then I've pulled loads down in the past in my former career 
|
Posted By: skyblue
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 10:13am
Paul10 wrote:
Out of interest which bit doesn't work in our favour?
Which bit of the potential ospreys proposal would out weigh our potential proposal?
Not saying our survival is a given.... Just curious. |
Population size is the main one. [/QUOTE]
What appears to have happened is that the O's now have a direct public service backer & partner. They seem to have lured Y11 into continuing to invest by offering ongoing public money and investment ( Bit like the Welsh Gov use to do to attract & retain overseas businesses to relocate to Wales). Would Carmarthenshire Council enter into a business partnership with Scarlet's I wonder?
------------- KRR
|
Posted By: Mrfwon
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 10:15am
PE SA wrote:
With the tender being for a West Wales team, population is the same for both teams no ? Although Ospreys are fighting the case for swansea and only swansea, scarlets have fought for West wales. The key imo. |
Correct 
------------- Scarlets!!!
|
Posted By: Fscarlet
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 10:33am
RR1972 wrote:
it’s a nonsense either are even considered to be cut. id love to see “the data” that says the dragons have to stay and a west wales region shut. more wru rubbish |
I raised that very point & was told that as it stands, right now the Dragons are in a good place.
|
Posted By: glyndwr
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 10:35am
skyblue wrote:
Paul10 wrote:
Out of interest which bit doesn't work in our favour?
Which bit of the potential ospreys proposal would out weigh our potential proposal?
Not saying our survival is a given.... Just curious. |
Population size is the main one. |
What appears to have happened is that the O's now have a direct public service backer & partner. They seem to have lured Y11 into continuing to invest by offering ongoing public money and investment ( Bit like the Welsh Gov use to do to attract & retain overseas businesses to relocate to Wales). Would Carmarthenshire Council enter into a business partnership with Scarlet's I wonder? [/QUOTE]
You’d assume they are already given the stadium.
SCC are just more visible with Rob Stewart always putting himself front and centre.
As far as continue investment from Y11, this could easily be read as Y11 investing what SCC have had to pay to relocate the cricket and whites. Nothing is concrete with them still and the language is purposely designed to look optimistic without any long term guarantee.
------------- Yma O Hyd.
|
Posted By: glyndwr
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 10:38am
Fscarlet wrote:
RR1972 wrote:
it’s a nonsense either are even considered to be cut. id love to see “the data” that says the dragons have to stay and a west wales region shut. more wru rubbish |
I raised that very point & was told that as it stands, right now the Dragons are in a good place. |
Can you say what was asked as a whole and what was said?
------------- Yma O Hyd.
|
Posted By: Fscarlet
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 10:50am
glyndwr wrote:
Fscarlet wrote:
RR1972 wrote:
it’s a nonsense either are even considered to be cut. id love to see “the data” that says the dragons have to stay and a west wales region shut. more wru rubbish |
I raised that very point & was told that as it stands, right now the Dragons are in a good place. |
Can you say what was asked as a whole and what was said? |
I'll be honest a lot of it was "What else can we do?" They bemoaned the state of the WRUs finances when they arrived & said that it is now likely to go to tender. They didn't like it when someone said (when they said the Dragons were in a great position financially) "Yes because they were bailed out by the WRU previously."
|
Posted By: dantheman
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 11:02am
|
Where does it say anywhere that Y11 are investing in the Ospreys?
Rob Davies is the only Ospreys rep on that press statement. While he may have an interest in Y11, the obvious conclusion is that he's acting by himself. It's a risk to us if he can get together a consortium to bid on a tender but I don't think he's got the funding to do that himself.
If his investment in St Helens is restricted to a stand (which they already have from Worcester), TV facilities (basically some WiFi, power and telecoms connections) and a fan zone (a temp marquee type structure, or maybe even just some food/drink stalls) it really won't be much in terms of funding.
|
Posted By: Lincscarlet
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 11:11am
|
Luckily we don't need Stradeyboyo, because I put on my ghilly suit and hid behind a plant pot in the boardroom, and I heard everything. Here's the main points:
Instead of giving Scarlets the £8m payout awarded by the court case, the WRU are giving us Ospreys. We have to take on their debts and players but we do get to have a badge that shows a dragon shagging an osprey as of the 27/28 season.
Home games will be played at Parc Y Scarlets, away games to be played at St Helens, but judgement day games will now be hosted on a potato field near Felinwint. And we're going to move the East stand from the Parc to St Helens so they have some seats.
To sweeten the deal, Nanny Goggins in Fishgard has agreed to falsify documents 'proving' Ardie Savea and Antoine Dupont are her grandkids and therefore eligible for Wales, and sign them for us this summer.
This all depends on PRA32 being signed before 2035 though, so it might not happen.
|
Posted By: Tony Clifton
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 11:23am
|
Well there we are then. Really hope HoL step up to help with the tender.
|
Posted By: Scrletsfan32x
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 11:29am
Tony Clifton wrote:
Well there we are then. Really hope HoL step up to help with the tender. | I wouldn’t count on them
|
Posted By: Tony Clifton
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 11:32am
|
Feels like the wind has dropped form our sails from where we could have been, and Ospreys are taking the headlines these days.
|
Posted By: Lincscarlet
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 11:45am
|
The emptiest vessels make the loudest noise - all I see is desperation from the Swansea lot to not be berated the rest of their lives by the locals, and when the smoke clears and its Scarlets, Dragons and the WRUin Superblues left standing they will all be able to say that they 'tried everything' to keep the Ospreys as one of the 3 regions, with press cuttings to prove it. and the blame will be successfully passed onto us and the WRU.
|
Posted By: Raised By Peregos
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 11:52am
I dunno, I get the whole, no news is good news, keeping your powder dry, emptiest vessels etc. but we are DEFINITELY in a worse position that we were a few weeks ago.
I don't feel as confident about a tender as some on here.
|
Posted By: ladram
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 12:00pm
Raised By Peregos wrote:
I dunno, I get the whole, no news is good news, keeping your powder dry, emptiest vessels etc. but we are DEFINITELY in a worse position that we were a few weeks ago.
I don't feel as confident about a tender as some on here. |
You'll from our lot when they want the "loyal" fans to rally behind the cause
|
Posted By: Tony Clifton
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 12:12pm
Raised By Peregos wrote:
I dunno, I get the whole, no news is good news, keeping your powder dry, emptiest vessels etc. but we are DEFINITELY in a worse position that we were a few weeks ago.
I don't feel as confident about a tender as some on here. |
Same here. End of Jan it was a slam dunk we were surviving. Now it’s a 50/50 shot.
|
Posted By: PE SA
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 12:13pm
|
I think it goes to 3 teams and we survive or absolutely nothing changes
|
Posted By: Wasp
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 12:44pm
Fscarlet wrote:
RR1972 wrote:
it’s a nonsense either are even considered to be cut. id love to see “the data” that says the dragons have to stay and a west wales region shut. more wru rubbish |
I raised that very point & was told that as it stands, right now the Dragons are in a good place. |
With whom? Just curious
------------- We're still still here, but I wish we were in an Anglo-Welsh
|
Posted By: Wasp
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 12:48pm
Lincscarlet wrote:
The emptiest vessels make the loudest noise - all I see is desperation from the Swansea lot to not be berated the rest of their lives by the locals, and when the smoke clears and its Scarlets, Dragons and the WRUin Superblues left standing they will all be able to say that they 'tried everything' to keep the Ospreys as one of the 3 regions, with press cuttings to prove it. and the blame will be successfully passed onto us and the WRU. |
Everything I have seen and heard on and off record since this debacle reared it's head leads me to totally agree with that statement!
There's also a lot opportunism going on from certain people who are nothing to do with rugby, have said sweet FA until the last 2 months but now see a chance for some publicity.
------------- We're still still here, but I wish we were in an Anglo-Welsh
|
Posted By: RR1972
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 12:49pm
Tony Clifton wrote:
Raised By Peregos wrote:
I dunno, I get the whole, no news is good news, keeping your powder dry, emptiest vessels etc. but we are DEFINITELY in a worse position that we were a few weeks ago.
I don't feel as confident about a tender as some on here. |
Same here. End of Jan it was a slam dunk we were surviving. Now it’s a 50/50 shot. | i really dont see how our position has changed. ospreys oweners still want out, they still want to buy cardiff, the wru still want 3 teams and the wru still want to sell cardiff, if it goes to the 3 the ospreys go, if it stays at 4 we all stay
|
Posted By: ladram
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 12:54pm
PE SA wrote:
I think it goes to 3 teams and we survive or absolutely nothing changes |
thanks for sharing your wishes because that's all they are
|
Posted By: Wasp
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 12:55pm
- Population - a tie, it's the same area covered by whoever wins
- Schools, university collaboration - see above.
- Facilities and fan experience - we smash it
- Potential for corporate sponsorship and hospitality - we smash it
- Long term committed backers - we win, I'd say, given Y11's love of a merger or move to Cardiff and their CEO saying it was not viable in St Helens!!
- UK based directors, bank accounts and company HQ - we win
- Engagement with the community - if bums on seats is a metric, we win
- Geographical location and access for future customers - Tricky but St Helens probably edges it.
If I had to bet £50 on the outcome it wouldn't be on the Os
------------- We're still still here, but I wish we were in an Anglo-Welsh
|
Posted By: Raised By Peregos
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 1:00pm
Wasp wrote:
- Population - a tie, it's the same area covered by whoever wins
- Schools, university collaboration - see above.
- Facilities and fan experience - we smash it
- Potential for corporate sponsorship and hospitality - we smash it
- Long term committed backers - we win, I'd say, given Y11's love of a merger or move to Cardiff and their CEO saying it was not viable in St Helens!!
- UK based directors, bank accounts and company HQ - we win
- Engagement with the community - if bums on seats is a metric, we win
- Geographical location and access for future customers - Tricky but St Helens probably edges it.
If I had to bet £50 on the outcome it wouldn't be on the Os |
I'd say point 2 has changed since the StH announcement - that'll increase their links with the Uni by a huge amount.
Point 3 will take into account transport links (also point 8) and city centre entertainment on StH doorstep.
Point 4 - Will be the same whomever wins I would've said.
Point 5 - depends entirely on what happens there. Again, not so cut and dried.
Point 7 - see StH announcement.
I think it's closer than you think. Especially if you factor in the behind the scenes machinations of loud, amplified voices, and money talks.
|
Posted By: PE SA
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 1:02pm
ladram wrote:
PE SA wrote:
I think it goes to 3 teams and we survive or absolutely nothing changes |
thanks for sharing your wishes because that's all they are | youre welcome. Same as everyone else here isnt it.
|
Posted By: PE SA
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 1:04pm
Raised By Peregos wrote:
Wasp wrote:
- Population - a tie, it's the same area covered by whoever wins
- Schools, university collaboration - see above.
- Facilities and fan experience - we smash it
- Potential for corporate sponsorship and hospitality - we smash it
- Long term committed backers - we win, I'd say, given Y11's love of a merger or move to Cardiff and their CEO saying it was not viable in St Helens!!
- UK based directors, bank accounts and company HQ - we win
- Engagement with the community - if bums on seats is a metric, we win
- Geographical location and access for future customers - Tricky but St Helens probably edges it.
If I had to bet £50 on the outcome it wouldn't be on the Os |
I'd say point 2 has changed since the StH announcement - that'll increase their links with the Uni by a huge amount.
Point 3 will take into account transport links (also point 8) and city centre entertainment on StH doorstep.
Point 4 - Will be the same whomever wins I would've said.
Point 5 - depends entirely on what happens there. Again, not so cut and dried.
Point 7 - see StH announcement.
I think it's closer than you think. Especially if you factor in the behind the scenes machinations of loud, amplified voices, and money talks. |
2 wouldn't have changed as whoever wins will have the links. We have links with CSG, Llandovery etc...Ospreys would have them if they win. Population and schools etc is a tie for both.
|
Posted By: Redadare
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 1:11pm
Wasp wrote:
- Population - a tie, it's the same area covered by whoever wins
- Schools, university collaboration - see above.
- Facilities and fan experience - we smash it
- Potential for corporate sponsorship and hospitality - we smash it
- Long term committed backers - we win, I'd say, given Y11's love of a merger or move to Cardiff and their CEO saying it was not viable in St Helens!!
- UK based directors, bank accounts and company HQ - we win
- Engagement with the community - if bums on seats is a metric, we win
- Geographical location and access for future customers - Tricky but St Helens probably edges it.
If I had to bet £50 on the outcome it wouldn't be on the Os |
100% couple weeks ago I was very optimistic, now it looks like the Os have the upper hand, very concerning
|
Posted By: Tony Clifton
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 1:15pm
Posted By: Wasp
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 1:15pm
Raised By Peregos wrote:
Wasp wrote:
- Population - a tie, it's the same area covered by whoever wins
- Schools, university collaboration - see above.
- Facilities and fan experience - we smash it
- Potential for corporate sponsorship and hospitality - we smash it
- Long term committed backers - we win, I'd say, given Y11's love of a merger or move to Cardiff and their CEO saying it was not viable in St Helens!!
- UK based directors, bank accounts and company HQ - we win
- Engagement with the community - if bums on seats is a metric, we win
- Geographical location and access for future customers - Tricky but St Helens probably edges it.
If I had to bet £50 on the outcome it wouldn't be on the Os |
I'd say point 2 has changed since the StH announcement - that'll increase their links with the Uni by a huge amount.
Point 3 will take into account transport links (also point 8) and city centre entertainment on StH doorstep.
Point 4 - Will be the same whomever wins I would've said.
Point 5 - depends entirely on what happens there. Again, not so cut and dried.
Point 7 - see StH announcement.
I think it's closer than you think. Especially if you factor in the behind the scenes machinations of loud, amplified voices, and money talks. |
Don't agree with you on 2. Whoever wins will be the only people available to work with Universities. Point 4 is based on our corporate facilities. We have capacity for close to 1000 in hospitality, maybe more. And that's without adding marquees if we really need them. And the barn of course
I don't think it's cut and dried either ,BTW and there's no guarantee that those making the decision won't judge the criteria in accordance with their own desires. But on paper, we must be favourite.
------------- We're still still here, but I wish we were in an Anglo-Welsh
|
Posted By: Seagultaf
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 1:21pm
I believe Scarlets also have a strategic partnership with Swansea University. But I think the biggest threat to the Scarlets is Reddin aim to have two teams one in Cardiff and one in Swansea.
|
Posted By: skyblue
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 1:21pm
|
"Ospreys owners still want out" I initially thought that too until the last day or two and the suggested commitment (Council minutes) by Y11 to fund the new stand, fan zone & broadcast infrastructure. Why commit £1000's if they're out? Is the seemingly commitment legally binding?
------------- KRR
|
Posted By: KID A
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 1:24pm
Wasp wrote:
- Population - a tie, it's the same area covered by whoever wins
- Schools, university collaboration - see above.
- Facilities and fan experience - we smash it
- Potential for corporate sponsorship and hospitality - we smash it
- Long term committed backers - we win, I'd say, given Y11's love of a merger or move to Cardiff and their CEO saying it was not viable in St Helens!!
- UK based directors, bank accounts and company HQ - we win
- Engagement with the community - if bums on seats is a metric, we win
- Geographical location and access for future customers - Tricky but St Helens probably edges it.
If I had to bet £50 on the outcome it wouldn't be on the Os |
Hope you're right.
But if Reddin wants city teams, and he asks 2 teams to come up with a tender, he picks the city one.
|
Posted By: Raised By Peregos
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 1:27pm
Wasp wrote:
Raised By Peregos wrote:
Wasp wrote:
- Population - a tie, it's the same area covered by whoever wins
- Schools, university collaboration - see above.
- Facilities and fan experience - we smash it
- Potential for corporate sponsorship and hospitality - we smash it
- Long term committed backers - we win, I'd say, given Y11's love of a merger or move to Cardiff and their CEO saying it was not viable in St Helens!!
- UK based directors, bank accounts and company HQ - we win
- Engagement with the community - if bums on seats is a metric, we win
- Geographical location and access for future customers - Tricky but St Helens probably edges it.
If I had to bet £50 on the outcome it wouldn't be on the Os |
I'd say point 2 has changed since the StH announcement - that'll increase their links with the Uni by a huge amount.
Point 3 will take into account transport links (also point 8) and city centre entertainment on StH doorstep.
Point 4 - Will be the same whomever wins I would've said.
Point 5 - depends entirely on what happens there. Again, not so cut and dried.
Point 7 - see StH announcement.
I think it's closer than you think. Especially if you factor in the behind the scenes machinations of loud, amplified voices, and money talks. |
Don't agree with you on 2. Whoever wins will be the only people available to work with Universities. Point 4 is based on our corporate facilities. We have capacity for close to 1000 in hospitality, maybe more. And that's without adding marquees if we really need them. And the barn of course
I don't think it's cut and dried either ,BTW and there's no guarantee that those making the decision won't judge the criteria in accordance with their own desires. But on paper, we must be favourite.
|
To you, and the other poster who said about 2 - I stand corrected - I checked back at the reports about St.H and it seems to explicitly NOT state the Uni will use it. I was going to say that strategic partnerships aside, the Uni would be playing at St.H but that doesn't appear to be the case. Oddly. Maybe that's a subtle indication about uni partnerships with the West tender?
|
Posted By: PE SA
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 1:37pm
KID A wrote:
Wasp wrote:
- Population - a tie, it's the same area covered by whoever wins
- Schools, university collaboration - see above.
- Facilities and fan experience - we smash it
- Potential for corporate sponsorship and hospitality - we smash it
- Long term committed backers - we win, I'd say, given Y11's love of a merger or move to Cardiff and their CEO saying it was not viable in St Helens!!
- UK based directors, bank accounts and company HQ - we win
- Engagement with the community - if bums on seats is a metric, we win
- Geographical location and access for future customers - Tricky but St Helens probably edges it.
If I had to bet £50 on the outcome it wouldn't be on the Os |
Hope you're right.
But if Reddin wants city teams, and he asks 2 teams to come up with a tender, he picks the city one. |
The criteria has to be agreed by all applicants is how it was stated. So i cant see us agreeing to city status to be one of the criterias as automatically puts us out. Agreeing the criteria alone is going to take months. Then the tender itself is going to take months....I personally cant see this ending by end of next season.
What I am more curious of though is what happens if Y11 now pull out of Cardiff due to all this backlash? All eyes will be on WRU then to see what they do. As more, shall we say, favours, will be under an extreme microscope due to recent legal hearings etc. Will WRU simply close Cardiff down - as their own admission that they cannot afford to keep them, theyre also struggling to sell , so will close them? I personally dont buy this they'd just sell to the other consortium as even that will take up many more months if they ever find one.
|
Posted By: skyblue
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 1:38pm
KID A wrote:
Wasp wrote:
- Population - a tie, it's the same area covered by whoever wins
- Schools, university collaboration - see above.
- Facilities and fan experience - we smash it
- Potential for corporate sponsorship and hospitality - we smash it
- Long term committed backers - we win, I'd say, given Y11's love of a merger or move to Cardiff and their CEO saying it was not viable in St Helens!!
- UK based directors, bank accounts and company HQ - we win
- Engagement with the community - if bums on seats is a metric, we win
- Geographical location and access for future customers - Tricky but St Helens probably edges it.
If I had to bet £50 on the outcome it wouldn't be on the Os |
Hope you're right.
But if Reddin wants city teams, and he asks 2 teams to come up with a tender, he picks the city one. |
Early days yet & information is scarce. My thoughts are if Y11 is permitted to own 2 teams and in conjunction with ongoing financial backing from a Council (to a business having the backing of public funds must be a strong draw) could we be looking at a situation where all 4 teams are maintained?
------------- KRR
|
Posted By: KID A
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 1:38pm
PE SA wrote:
KID A wrote:
Wasp wrote:
- Population - a tie, it's the same area covered by whoever wins
- Schools, university collaboration - see above.
- Facilities and fan experience - we smash it
- Potential for corporate sponsorship and hospitality - we smash it
- Long term committed backers - we win, I'd say, given Y11's love of a merger or move to Cardiff and their CEO saying it was not viable in St Helens!!
- UK based directors, bank accounts and company HQ - we win
- Engagement with the community - if bums on seats is a metric, we win
- Geographical location and access for future customers - Tricky but St Helens probably edges it.
If I had to bet £50 on the outcome it wouldn't be on the Os |
Hope you're right.
But if Reddin wants city teams, and he asks 2 teams to come up with a tender, he picks the city one. |
The criteria has to be agreed by all applicants is how it was stated. So i cant see us agreeing to city status to be one of the criterias as automatically puts us out. Agreeing the criteria alone is going to take months. Then the tender itself is going to take months....I personally cant see this ending by end of next season.
What I am more curious of though is what happens if Y11 now pull out of Cardiff due to all this backlash? All eyes will be on WRU then to see what they do. As more, shall we say, favours, will be under an extreme microscope due to recent legal hearings etc. Will WRU simply close Cardiff down - as their own admission that they cannot afford to keep them so have to sell. I personally dont buy this they'd just sell to the other consortium as even that will take up many more months!
|
The criteria will be absolutely fair. The WRU will be free to choose who they want.
|
Posted By: KID A
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 1:40pm
skyblue wrote:
could we be looking at a situation where all 4 teams are maintained? |
It would be the most Welsh rugby thing ever; to spend years agonising and millions wasted....to remain at 4 and effectively be in a worse position, with the exec board resigning. So yes.
|
Posted By: PE SA
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 1:40pm
KID A wrote:
PE SA wrote:
KID A wrote:
Wasp wrote:
- Population - a tie, it's the same area covered by whoever wins
- Schools, university collaboration - see above.
- Facilities and fan experience - we smash it
- Potential for corporate sponsorship and hospitality - we smash it
- Long term committed backers - we win, I'd say, given Y11's love of a merger or move to Cardiff and their CEO saying it was not viable in St Helens!!
- UK based directors, bank accounts and company HQ - we win
- Engagement with the community - if bums on seats is a metric, we win
- Geographical location and access for future customers - Tricky but St Helens probably edges it.
If I had to bet £50 on the outcome it wouldn't be on the Os |
Hope you're right.
But if Reddin wants city teams, and he asks 2 teams to come up with a tender, he picks the city one. |
The criteria has to be agreed by all applicants is how it was stated. So i cant see us agreeing to city status to be one of the criterias as automatically puts us out. Agreeing the criteria alone is going to take months. Then the tender itself is going to take months....I personally cant see this ending by end of next season.
What I am more curious of though is what happens if Y11 now pull out of Cardiff due to all this backlash? All eyes will be on WRU then to see what they do. As more, shall we say, favours, will be under an extreme microscope due to recent legal hearings etc. Will WRU simply close Cardiff down - as their own admission that they cannot afford to keep them so have to sell. I personally dont buy this they'd just sell to the other consortium as even that will take up many more months!
|
The criteria will be absolutely fair. The WRU will be free to choose who they want. |
Well...it is supposedly decided by someone independent to wru...but I know they can get who they want.
|
Posted By: steve evans
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 2:04pm
|
The main thing that is missing on the list is branding - the Scarlets brand has had its ups and downs but it is has always tried to remain true to providing entertaining, running rugby, sometimes not succesfully but is renowned across the rugby world for this - our brand. Fans have largely stuck with the club and await the next Renaissance of Scarlets rugby.
The Ospreys brand is now damaged, there we few supporters that turned up at the Liberty and now there are even less. Y11 and Lance Bradley are not favoured by the fans. The annoucement, yesterday that the Ospreys are returning "home to Swansea" next season will not go down well with the new Bridgend area fans. With the main players exiting this season they are such a long way from when they were the Galacticos. So unless they do a lot of recruiting, onfield they are going to struggle, which will not encourage fans to attend. If Wales qualify for the World cup and Swansea FC maintain their position more emphasis will be on football than rugby in Swansea and with that competition for season tickets and game attendance. They have so many problems we fortuneatly don't have
|
Posted By: Tony Clifton
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 2:05pm
|
Reddin prefers keeping Ospreys, RCK prefers us. That’s how I’ve always heard it.
|
Posted By: Mrfwon
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 2:45pm
and here we are, 5 pages in to a new thread talking about the same stuff as the other thread that's nearly 650 pages long    
------------- Scarlets!!!
|
Posted By: Tony Clifton
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 2:46pm
Well we have the get the numbers up somehow!
|
Posted By: Mugwuffin
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 2:46pm
Tony Clifton wrote:
Reddin prefers keeping Ospreys, RCK prefers us. That’s how I’ve always heard it. | That was the talk before Reddin visited us. Someone at the club told me that he had commented that he was impressed with our facility and that we were the only team with our own on-site training field, barn and gym. I’m not sure if that would’ve changed his mind, but it does give us a massive advantage in a tendering process. St Helen’s will likely be the worst stadium in the league next season. Possibly the worst in top level professional rugby in Europe; An uncovered old terrace, a very small main stand with no hospitality, and it sounds like there’ll be a new (second hand) temporary stand behind the posts. It’s good that Swansea Council are investing in the pitch and floodlights. That’s beneficial for Swansea RFC and community use even if the Ospreys end up leaving pro men’s rugby, so it’ll never be money wasted. I don’t think this investment or erecting a temporary stand shifts the goalposts much in terms of the ‘West Licence’ though.
|
Posted By: Albert
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 3:04pm
Wasp wrote:
- Population - a tie, it's the same area covered by whoever wins
- Schools, university collaboration - see above.
- Facilities and fan experience - we smash it
- Potential for corporate sponsorship and hospitality - we smash it
- Long term committed backers - we win, I'd say, given Y11's love of a merger or move to Cardiff and their CEO saying it was not viable in St Helens!!
- UK based directors, bank accounts and company HQ - we win
- Engagement with the community - if bums on seats is a metric, we win
- Geographical location and access for future customers - Tricky but St Helens probably edges it.
If I had to bet £50 on the outcome it wouldn't be on the Os |
Agree with most of above but not No.8 I live near Cardiff. I would be parked and walking to Y Parc at the time that I would be still stuck in a traffic jam a few miles from St Helens.. Where to park down there would be another added problem. I would think that most travellers from the east would agree. Ironically, that catchment would include a lot of current Osprey fans.
------------- It's a thinking man's game
|
Posted By: Tony Clifton
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 3:47pm
Mugwuffin wrote:
Tony Clifton wrote:
Reddin prefers keeping Ospreys, RCK prefers us. That’s how I’ve always heard it. | That was the talk before Reddin visited us. Someone at the club told me that he had commented that he was impressed with our facility and that we were the only team with our own on-site training field, barn and gym. I’m not sure if that would’ve changed his mind, but it does give us a massive advantage in a tendering process. St Helen’s will likely be the worst stadium in the league next season. Possibly the worst in top level professional rugby in Europe; An uncovered old terrace, a very small main stand with no hospitality, and it sounds like there’ll be a new (second hand) temporary stand behind the posts. It’s good that Swansea Council are investing in the pitch and floodlights. That’s beneficial for Swansea RFC and community use even if the Ospreys end up leaving pro men’s rugby, so it’ll never be money wasted. I don’t think this investment or erecting a temporary stand shifts the goalposts much in terms of the ‘West Licence’ though. |
Yes, PYS is truly a gem, and should serve as a community and regional hub for rugby in west Wales. Everything Reddin wants for performance, we have.
|
Posted By: RedMist
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 6:58pm
skyblue wrote:
"Ospreys owners still want out" I initially thought that too until the last day or two and the suggested commitment (Council minutes) by Y11 to fund the new stand, fan zone & broadcast infrastructure. Why commit £1000's if they're out? Is the seemingly commitment legally binding? |
If I had to guess - the reason would be that any lawyers fees and delays in quitting contracts etc would far outweigh the cost of this if it means there's a chance they can make any legal action against them unwinnable or prevent it from happening.
|
Posted By: RedMist
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 7:11pm
Ospreys don't make money, they don't know if Cardiff will make money (haven't so far). Y11 won't want to carry two loss making businesses.
They will either shut down or sell up. You'd think any sale would have to happen before the tender. If it's selling to an unknown then there's a downside based on lack of track record. If it's to Rob Davies, that's more problematic but he doesn't have the financial clout and he's already sold up once before (y11 own about 75%?)
Before we get too negative, they're still playing out of a stadium that makes Rodney Parade look modern next season in a curious location. Send the WRU in there to visit at rush hour during term time!
If all else fails it will occur to SCC that selling the Vetch and building on it just around the corner in a far worse area made some people a boat load of.cash.
|
Posted By: RR1972
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 7:18pm
Albert wrote:
Wasp wrote:
- Population - a tie, it's the same area covered by whoever wins
- Schools, university collaboration - see above.
- Facilities and fan experience - we smash it
- Potential for corporate sponsorship and hospitality - we smash it
- Long term committed backers - we win, I'd say, given Y11's love of a merger or move to Cardiff and their CEO saying it was not viable in St Helens!!
- UK based directors, bank accounts and company HQ - we win
- Engagement with the community - if bums on seats is a metric, we win
- Geographical location and access for future customers - Tricky but St Helens probably edges it.
If I had to bet £50 on the outcome it wouldn't be on the Os |
Agree with most of above but not No.8 I live near Cardiff. I would be parked and walking to Y Parc at the time that I would be still stuck in a traffic jam a few miles from St Helens.. Where to park down there would be another added problem. I would think that most travellers from the east would agree. Ironically, that catchment would include a lot of current Osprey fans. | the stadium hilds 6500 how much of s traffuc jam would that cause? games are played on fri nights or sat pm not rush hour, traffc and parking wont be an issue tnh
|
Posted By: Wasp
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 7:22pm
RedMist wrote:
skyblue wrote:
"Ospreys owners still want out" I initially thought that too until the last day or two and the suggested commitment (Council minutes) by Y11 to fund the new stand, fan zone & broadcast infrastructure. Why commit £1000's if they're out? Is the seemingly commitment legally binding? |
If I had to guess - the reason would be that any lawyers fees and delays in quitting contracts etc would far outweigh the cost of this if it means there's a chance they can make any legal action against them unwinnable or prevent it from happening. |
Whatever happens they have to play somewhere next season. Chucking a few quid erecting a stand the've already bought and some other improvements is small change. The fanzone will be a marquee type structure. On the submitted plans, phase 1 shows the fanzone as grass, with a legend saying "Covered fan zone". The broadcast infrastructure will be scaffolding.
------------- We're still still here, but I wish we were in an Anglo-Welsh
|
Posted By: RR1972
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 7:24pm
Wasp wrote:
RedMist wrote:
skyblue wrote:
"Ospreys owners still want out" I initially thought that too until the last day or two and the suggested commitment (Council minutes) by Y11 to fund the new stand, fan zone & broadcast infrastructure. Why commit £1000's if they're out? Is the seemingly commitment legally binding? |
If I had to guess - the reason would be that any lawyers fees and delays in quitting contracts etc would far outweigh the cost of this if it means there's a chance they can make any legal action against them unwinnable or prevent it from happening. |
Whatever happens they have to play somewhere next season. Chucking a few quid erecting a stand the've already bought and some other improvements is small change. The fanzone will be a marquee type structure. On the submitted plans, phase 1 shows the fanzone as grass, with a legend saying "Covered fan zone". The broadcast infrastructure will be scaffolding. | seasom atarts what seot its nigh on april now even a small refurb is a tight tine frame
|
Posted By: Wasp
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 7:38pm
RR1972 wrote:
Wasp wrote:
RedMist wrote:
skyblue wrote:
"Ospreys owners still want out" I initially thought that too until the last day or two and the suggested commitment (Council minutes) by Y11 to fund the new stand, fan zone & broadcast infrastructure. Why commit £1000's if they're out? Is the seemingly commitment legally binding? |
If I had to guess - the reason would be that any lawyers fees and delays in quitting contracts etc would far outweigh the cost of this if it means there's a chance they can make any legal action against them unwinnable or prevent it from happening. |
Whatever happens they have to play somewhere next season. Chucking a few quid erecting a stand the've already bought and some other improvements is small change. The fanzone will be a marquee type structure. On the submitted plans, phase 1 shows the fanzone as grass, with a legend saying "Covered fan zone". The broadcast infrastructure will be scaffolding. | seasom atarts what seot its nigh on april now even a small refurb is a tight tine frame |
Yeah, There's not much chance of building anything complex, but who knows, they may have stuff lined up
------------- We're still still here, but I wish we were in an Anglo-Welsh
|
Posted By: Wil Chips
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 7:42pm
Key question here...how much does it cost the Ospreys to use the Brewery Field for another year versus how much have they committed to the St Helens ground for next season.
I'm guessing they might be the same £...this assumes the Ospreys are both Y11 and Rob Davies in this matter ( and not just Rob Davies).
|
Posted By: Albert
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 7:43pm
RR1972 wrote:
Albert wrote:
Wasp wrote:
- Population - a tie, it's the same area covered by whoever wins
- Schools, university collaboration - see above.
- Facilities and fan experience - we smash it
- Potential for corporate sponsorship and hospitality - we smash it
- Long term committed backers - we win, I'd say, given Y11's love of a merger or move to Cardiff and their CEO saying it was not viable in St Helens!!
- UK based directors, bank accounts and company HQ - we win
- Engagement with the community - if bums on seats is a metric, we win
- Geographical location and access for future customers - Tricky but St Helens probably edges it.
If I had to bet £50 on the outcome it wouldn't be on the Os |
Agree with most of above but not No.8 I live near Cardiff. I would be parked and walking to Y Parc at the time that I would be still stuck in a traffic jam a few miles from St Helens.. Where to park down there would be another added problem. I would think that most travellers from the east would agree. Ironically, that catchment would include a lot of current Osprey fans. | the stadium hilds 6500 how much of s traffuc jam would that cause? games are played on fri nights or sat pm not rush hour, traffc and parking wont be an issue tnh |
It's not the rugby which causes the traffic jams. Have you ever done that journey on a Friday night from Britton Ferry down to Swansea , or more to the point onwards towards Mumbles? From Britton Ferry onwards to Llanelli is fairly clear. Re, parking: where would that be?
------------- It's a thinking man's game
|
Posted By: ladram
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 7:53pm
RedMist wrote:
Ospreys don't make money, they don't know if Cardiff will make money (haven't so far). Y11 won't want to carry two loss making businesses.
They will either shut down or sell up. You'd think any sale would have to happen before the tender. If it's selling to an unknown then there's a downside based on lack of track record. If it's to Rob Davies, that's more problematic but he doesn't have the financial clout and he's already sold up once before (y11 own about 75%?)
Before we get too negative, they're still playing out of a stadium that makes Rodney Parade look modern next season in a curious location. Send the WRU in there to visit at rush hour during term time!
If all else fails it will occur to SCC that selling the Vetch and building on it just around the corner in a far worse area made some people a boat load of.cash.
|
Same could be said about Stradey
|
Posted By: Ben10thomas
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 7:53pm
|
Believe me I live a mile away 6500 in St Helens will cause chaos traffic wise. There is no on-street parking availability the Rec is a park and ride but access and egress is restricted via diversions.Any significant crowds will cause significant issues as the traffic flow is at present.
|
Posted By: crj89
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 9:51pm
Ben10thomas wrote:
Believe me I live a mile away 6500 in St Helens will cause chaos traffic wise.There is no on-street parking availability the Rec is a park and ride but access and egress is restricted via diversions.Any significant crowds will cause significant issues as the traffic flow is at present. |
I agree, I live in Swansea also, and the traffic by Fabian way on a Friday is bonkers as it is. Mumbles and Arena traffic on a Saturday doesn’t help either.
|
Posted By: gnasher1975
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 11:04pm
Redadare wrote:
Wasp wrote:
- Population - a tie, it's the same area covered by whoever wins
- Schools, university collaboration - see above.
- Facilities and fan experience - we smash it
- Potential for corporate sponsorship and hospitality - we smash it
- Long term committed backers - we win, I'd say, given Y11's love of a merger or move to Cardiff and their CEO saying it was not viable in St Helens!!
- UK based directors, bank accounts and company HQ - we win
- Engagement with the community - if bums on seats is a metric, we win
- Geographical location and access for future customers - Tricky but St Helens probably edges it.
If I had to bet £50 on the outcome it wouldn't be on the Os |
100% couple weeks ago I was very optimistic, now it looks like the Os have the upper hand, very concerning |
How though? What has actually changed from a few weeks ago that surpasses us?
|
Posted By: gnasher1975
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 11:06pm
KID A wrote:
Wasp wrote:
- Population - a tie, it's the same area covered by whoever wins
- Schools, university collaboration - see above.
- Facilities and fan experience - we smash it
- Potential for corporate sponsorship and hospitality - we smash it
- Long term committed backers - we win, I'd say, given Y11's love of a merger or move to Cardiff and their CEO saying it was not viable in St Helens!!
- UK based directors, bank accounts and company HQ - we win
- Engagement with the community - if bums on seats is a metric, we win
- Geographical location and access for future customers - Tricky but St Helens probably edges it.
If I had to bet £50 on the outcome it wouldn't be on the Os |
Hope you're right.
But if Reddin wants city teams, and he asks 2 teams to come up with a tender, he picks the city one. |
Surely we can legally challenge that process.
|
Posted By: roy munster
Date Posted: 26 March 2026 at 11:58pm
|
£10 million quid to reduce capacity to a measly 7000? with very little corporate hospo and destroying any potential future cricket revenues too...I know swansea council had a billions worth of regeneration money in their kitty ...But this still doesnt make much sense
------------- ROYMOND MUNTER MBE (FOR SERVICES TO THE COMBOVER)
|
|